2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic properties of crystalline materials observed in X-ray diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
377
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(384 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
6
377
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our simulations for the monoclinic phase 21 using the charge transfer (configuration interaction) multiplet approach 22 are consistent with the prediction of an estimated charge valence difference of ~0.45. 6 Calculated spectra were fitted to the experimental magnetic scattering and, as an additional constraint, we requested an agreement with the absorption spectrum in the insulating phase of rare earth RENiO 3 compounds.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, our simulations for the monoclinic phase 21 using the charge transfer (configuration interaction) multiplet approach 22 are consistent with the prediction of an estimated charge valence difference of ~0.45. 6 Calculated spectra were fitted to the experimental magnetic scattering and, as an additional constraint, we requested an agreement with the absorption spectrum in the insulating phase of rare earth RENiO 3 compounds.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Since E is symmetrically equivalent to the position vector r, it is also equivalently stated that there is a finite toroidal moment r × µ, a parity-odd rank-1 tensor, at the Gd sites. 24,25) The structure factor for the toroidal moment in the present case can therefore be represented by n,j (E n × µ n,j )e −iQ·(rj +dn) . This is finite at the same q vector as the magnetic cycloid; note that it is not ferrotoroidic.…”
Section: Local Noncentrosymmetry and Toroidal Momentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Y K Q are real spherical harmonics (also referred to as multipoles or spherical tensors) of rank K and projection Q (Lovesey et al, 2005), and T K Q ðpÞ are the corresponding tensor components and are functions of p. The merit of such an expansion lies in the fact that each non-vanishing multipole Y K Q must be consistent with the symmetry of the physical system. For example, an isotropic system allows only a single term in the expansion and we find…”
Section: Momentum Density and Rotational Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%