decreasing -donor and increasing -acceptor strengths of the trans L group.2 Although some pXa values are too close (those for 4-pic and py and those for isn, 4-acpy, and pz) to be used to make a very definite distinction in the and acidity of the trans ligands, the approximate ligand acidity order is NH3 < 4-pic 5 py < isn 5 4-acpy =* pz < pzH+ in these complexes.Reduction Potentials. Formal reduction potentials of trans-Ru(NH3)4(L)L'3+/2+ determined by cyclic voltammetry are listed in Table IV. The CV values of each complex fitted most of the criteria for a reversible couple.12 A CV of the reversible Ru-(NH3)5py3+/2+ couple was run under the same conditions and its values were used for comparison. Peak to peak separations increased (from 57 to 72 mV) with increasing scan rate (in different ranges, from 10 to 500 mV), which might be due to cell resistance. Some differences in the values of formal reduction potentials appeared in the literature (Table IV), and in some cases the differences are attributed to different experimental conditions.3•13 Previous observations showed that -unsaturated ligands, such as pyridines (py-X), lead to substantially more positive reduction potentials for the Ru(NH3)53+/2+ couples than when L is H20 or NH3 and that electron-withdrawing substituents (X) increase Ef, that is, the -accepting abilities of the ligands increase Et values.14 It was also observed13 that the substitution of a second ammonia by another ligand to give a Ru(NH3)4L23+/2+ complex yields more positive Ef values than for the corresponding Ru-(NH3)5L3+/2+ complex. Again, when an ammonia of Ru-(NH3)5(L)3+/2+ is substituted by another ligand U to yield Ru-(NH3)4(L,)(L)3+/2+, more positive E( values are also obtained.