1983
DOI: 10.1021/ar00094a002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The partnership of gas-phase core and valence photoelectron spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several investigators have obtained C Is energies of organometallic complexes15"18 and have related these results to the structure and bonding of these molecules. 19,20 In order to assess the ability of the present calculations to reproduce correct relative C Is ionization energies, we performed calculations on chromium-benzene organometallic complexes.15,18 A comparison of experimental and theoretical results is presented in Table V. One interesting result seen in Table V is that the calculated C Is shift is larger for the mono(benzene)chromium complex, Cr(C6H6), than it is for the bis(benzene)chromium complex, Cr(C6-H6)2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have obtained C Is energies of organometallic complexes15"18 and have related these results to the structure and bonding of these molecules. 19,20 In order to assess the ability of the present calculations to reproduce correct relative C Is ionization energies, we performed calculations on chromium-benzene organometallic complexes.15,18 A comparison of experimental and theoretical results is presented in Table V. One interesting result seen in Table V is that the calculated C Is shift is larger for the mono(benzene)chromium complex, Cr(C6H6), than it is for the bis(benzene)chromium complex, Cr(C6-H6)2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principles of this analysis were originally formulated by William L. Jolly and are illustrated schematically for the bdt S π+ FOE in Figure . Jolly found empirically that the ionization energy shift of a valence orbital localized on an atom, ΔIE V , was 0.80 ± 0.07 of the ionization energy shift of the core orbital on that atom, ΔIE C . Deviations of ΔIE V from 0.80ΔIE C were accounted for by the overlap of valence orbitals in bonding and antibonding interactions.…”
Section: Correlation Of Core and Valence Ionization Energy Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principles of this analysis were originally formulated by William L. Jolly and are illustrated schematically for the bdt S π+ FOE in Figure . Jolly found empirically that the ionization energy shift of a valence orbital localized on an atom, ΔIE V , was 0.80 ± 0.07 of the ionization energy shift of the core orbital on that atom, ΔIE C . Deviations of ΔIE V from 0.80ΔIE C were accounted for by the overlap of valence orbitals in bonding and antibonding interactions. Here we extend the concept of a localized orbital ionization potential (termed LOIP in Jolly’s analysis), in which the orbital is localized on a single atom, to the concept of a fragment orbital energy (FOE), in which the orbital may be delocalized within a fragment of a complex.…”
Section: Correlation Of Core and Valence Ionization Energy Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early 1980s, Jolly and co-workers developed an approach to studying the bonding character of MOs, using the chemical shift information of both core and valence levels of related compounds. 41 The basic principle of Jolly's approach is that the appropriately chosen core BEs can be used to subtract the contributions due to electrostatic potential (atomic charges) and relaxation energy from valence ionization potentials. It is then possible to quantify the bonding or antibonding character of molecular orbitals by using only experimental data.…”
Section: 2b the Assignments Of Re(co)mentioning
confidence: 99%