2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.161203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron paramagnetic resonance of boron acceptors in isotopically purified silicon

Abstract: The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) linewidths of B acceptors in Si are found to reduce dramatically in isotopically purified 28 Si single crystals. Moreover, extremely narrow substructures in the EPR spectra are visible corresponding to either an enhancement or a reduction of the absorbed microwave on resonance. The origin of the substructures is attributed to a combination of simultaneous double excitation and spin relaxation in the four level spin system of the acceptors. A spin population model is de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3(b)) on P. We observed Landau-Zener-Stuckelberg-Majorana interference at frequencies ranging from 10 GHz to 70 GHz. The dependence of the peak height on P agrees with the theoretical square Bessel function expression 35 . Landau-Zener-Stuckelberg-Majorana interference is observable even if the energy of one photon hf is smaller than the measurement temperature (1.5 K).…”
Section: Fig S5 Landau-zener-stuckelberg-majorana Interference In Dsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…3(b)) on P. We observed Landau-Zener-Stuckelberg-Majorana interference at frequencies ranging from 10 GHz to 70 GHz. The dependence of the peak height on P agrees with the theoretical square Bessel function expression 35 . Landau-Zener-Stuckelberg-Majorana interference is observable even if the energy of one photon hf is smaller than the measurement temperature (1.5 K).…”
Section: Fig S5 Landau-zener-stuckelberg-majorana Interference In Dsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…1(d) gives a g-factor of 1.80. This is much larger than the value 1.1 observed for Boron dopants in bulk Si [30], while smaller than the value 2.0 of the dangling bond defect centers at the siliconoxynitride interface [31]. We generally expect shallower defects to be more affected by the spin-orbit nature of the valence band, and their g-factors should be smaller than the value of deep dangling bond defects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In this experiment the modulation amplitude f (τ ) is given by the Overhauser field gradients which is also the limiting noise source for the coherence time. Therefore, an experimental realization in a silicon device (Si/SiGe or SiMos) significantly improves the RX qubit due better control (replacing Overhauser fields with a gradient from a micromagnet [58]) combined with a longer decoherence time from isotopic purification [226,227,228,83,174]. The initialization techniques, read-out schemes, and physical implementation are identical to the conventional EO qubit.…”
Section: Resonant Exchange (Rx) Qubitmentioning
confidence: 99%