1970
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.1.4784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Energy-Loss and Ultraviolet-Reflectivity Spectra of Crystalline ZnO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
41
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lattice constant of Zn 1− Ca O alloys in wurtzite structure increases with increasing Ca concentration, the variation slightly deviates from Vegard's law, and the wurtzite structure Zn 1− Ca O alloys are stable at concentrations x≤0. 25. The calculated band gap of wurtzite structure Zn 1− Ca O alloys shows a significant increase with increasing Ca concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lattice constant of Zn 1− Ca O alloys in wurtzite structure increases with increasing Ca concentration, the variation slightly deviates from Vegard's law, and the wurtzite structure Zn 1− Ca O alloys are stable at concentrations x≤0. 25. The calculated band gap of wurtzite structure Zn 1− Ca O alloys shows a significant increase with increasing Ca concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For oxides, there is no simple correspondence between valence electron densities, plasmon energies and electronic stopping: e.g., for ZnO the experimental plasmon energy [39] is consistent with the valence electron density, while for protons ox is lower by a factor of ~ 2 than anticipated for a FEG [6] (for v = 0.2 a.u.). Moreover, the SCS data spread much more than one would anticipate from their rs values (see Tab.…”
Section: Fig 1 Ox Of Vo2 For H Ions (Protons and Deuterons) In Bothmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The features on the spectra can be identified as follows. The dominant loss at 18 eV is a bulk plasmon loss [19] and [20]. The peak at 9.5 eV is identified as a surface plasmon loss [20].…”
Section: Openup (July 2007)mentioning
confidence: 99%