2011 IEEE 61st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ectc.2011.5898532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromigration behavior of interconnects between chip and board for embedded wafer level ball grid array (eWLB)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several representative resistance traces are shown in The authors further note that there is an appearance of bimodality in the resistance traces, which has also been observed on similar structures by R. Bauer, et al [5]. As such, the lifetime distributions in the next section are based on the first mode of failure, which is the more limiting failure mode for the calculation of current-carrying capability (Imax) of these process legs.…”
Section: Resistance Tracesmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several representative resistance traces are shown in The authors further note that there is an appearance of bimodality in the resistance traces, which has also been observed on similar structures by R. Bauer, et al [5]. As such, the lifetime distributions in the next section are based on the first mode of failure, which is the more limiting failure mode for the calculation of current-carrying capability (Imax) of these process legs.…”
Section: Resistance Tracesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These factors are also relevant to package-level interconnects. More recently, EM behavior of solder balls (including WLP) is being discussed [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, due to previously reported trace consumption issues [7,8] related to electromigration stress, there is also interest in examining the effect that Cu-RDL thickness has on device lifetime. To this end, two different Cu RDL thickness values are considered: 9µm and 14µm.…”
Section: Wafer Level Process Types Em Structure and Test Board Attrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent publications by Bauer et al [7] and Hau-Riege et al [8] have shown a number of different failure modes for Cu based UBM or RDL structures, but current carrying capacity for these structures is not provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation