1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0728(78)80397-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical study of tellurium oxido-reduction in aqueous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slime was very fine grained and dissolved slowly in the electrolyte, but it was possible to accumulate the powder in the amount sufficient for the chemical analysis. Such degradation of the tellurium electrode was observed earlier by others [3], but since now no identification of the compound was reported. Figure 7 shows current-time curves registered during potentiostatic cathodic dissolution of tellurium.…”
Section: Cathodic Polarizationsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The slime was very fine grained and dissolved slowly in the electrolyte, but it was possible to accumulate the powder in the amount sufficient for the chemical analysis. Such degradation of the tellurium electrode was observed earlier by others [3], but since now no identification of the compound was reported. Figure 7 shows current-time curves registered during potentiostatic cathodic dissolution of tellurium.…”
Section: Cathodic Polarizationsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…It was electrodeposition of elemental tellurium as a product of the reduction of HTeO 2 + ions or H 2 TeO 3 (process reversed to equation (3)). In contrast to the above, Barbier et al [3] reported that anodic polarization of tellurium in H 2 SO 4 solutions led to formation of TeO 2 , which dissolved then as HTeO 2 + ion and reduced to elemental tellurium at about -240 mV (SCE).…”
Section: Anodic Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Lingane and Niedrach, 1948;Jamieson and Perone, 1969;Shinagawa et a/., 1977;Barbier et al, 1978). In addition, more cathodic potentials result if larger cathodic currents are used;…”
Section: Results Of the Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%