2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1jm11561h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical glutamate biosensing with nanocube and nanosphere augmented single-walled carbon nanotube networks: a comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the CV profile, Randles-Sevcik analysis was used to determine the effective surface area , respectively. These values are relatively small in comparison to previous reported electrodes owing to the electrode size being ~130 times smaller than the electrode size reported from our research group 11 . Note that the MAB electrode effective surface area could be enhanced by modifying the surface with nanomaterials 11 .…”
Section: Biochip Design and Experimental Methodscontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Based on the CV profile, Randles-Sevcik analysis was used to determine the effective surface area , respectively. These values are relatively small in comparison to previous reported electrodes owing to the electrode size being ~130 times smaller than the electrode size reported from our research group 11 . Note that the MAB electrode effective surface area could be enhanced by modifying the surface with nanomaterials 11 .…”
Section: Biochip Design and Experimental Methodscontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…for a ferricyanide solution of 4 mm Fe(CN) 6 3À and 1 M KNO 3 ), 58,59 c is the solution concentration (mol cm À3 ), and v is the potential scan rate (V s À1 ). 60 CVs were obtained with a potential scan that was cycled between À0.2 and 0.6 V vs the Ag/AgCl reference electrode with a scan rate of 10 mV s À1 (Figure 4d).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 This superior performance makes Pt catalysts wellsuited for H 2 O 2 decomposition as demonstrated in a wide variety of small-scale applications including sensors/biosensors, 21−23 Pt-loaded stomatocytes, 24 tubular bubble thrusters or nanomotors/microengines, 25 and microelectromechanical system (MEMS) based thrusters. 26 PtNPs have been grown on a wide variety of substrates including highly conductive surfaces such as graphene, 27−29 carbon nanotubes (CNTs), 30,31 and graphene foam, 32 as well as nonconductive surfaces such as oxides (e.g., SiO 2 , aluminum oxide), 33 and paper/cellulose. 34 Templates such as mesoporous silica networks, polycarbonate, and porous anodic alumina are often employed to form Pt nanoparticles/nanowires onto surfaces via electrodeposition.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%