1958
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1958.0103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical conduction in solids II. Theory of temperature-dependent conductors

Abstract: The experiments in part I on the behaviour of the contact between metals when large currents pass the interface have yielded results which cannot be explained by the classical theory of constriction resistances. In an attempt to provide an account of this anomalous behaviour a new mathematical treatment of the general problem of the electrical heating of conductors has been developed. This treatment gives, under the appropriate conditions, a concise derivation of all the main results of the accepted theory; in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the thermal problem of a sample which is symmetric about the diagonal BB, the steady temperature T at any point in the sample can be expressed as follows (Greenwood and Williamson 1958):…”
Section: Current Density Distribution Near the Corner Of A Right-anglmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the thermal problem of a sample which is symmetric about the diagonal BB, the steady temperature T at any point in the sample can be expressed as follows (Greenwood and Williamson 1958):…”
Section: Current Density Distribution Near the Corner Of A Right-anglmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, is a scaling function. While this equation is well-known, most of the existing work on contact heating considers only the contribution of the Maxwell spreading resistance [10], [32]. Even for the smallest contact resistance in Fig.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle difference between the theory presented here and existing theory is that we assume that heating in the contact is due only to the Maxwell term in (5), . Greenwood and Williamson have previously shown that equipotential surfaces are also isothermals in a contact [32]. For initial development of the model, we assume that the contact is symmetric, with maximum temperature at the contact asperity.…”
Section: A Asperity Heating Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples show a peak temperature in the vicinity of the contact consistent with predictions from the VoltageTemperature relations developed by Kohlrausch 47 and refined by Greenwood and Williamson. 48 Samples with higher concentrations of Ni have a lower maximum temperature as compared to the poly crystalline Au samples. In all cases, this maximum temperature occurs at the narrowest point of contact due to the increased current density caused by constriction, which is the dominant factor in determining the thermal profile.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 97%