2006
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2006.878719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric Motor Drive Selection Issues for HEV Propulsion Systems: A Comparative Study

Abstract: Abstract-This paper describes a comparative study allowing the selection of the most appropriate electric-propulsion system for a parallel hybrid electric vehicle (HEV). This paper is based on an exhaustive review of the state of the art and on an effective comparison of the performances of the four main electricpropulsion systems, namely the dc motor, the induction motor (IM), the permanent magnet synchronous motor, and the switched reluctance motor. The main conclusion drawn by the proposed comparative study… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
127
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 545 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
127
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The perception is that rare-earth brushless PM motors offer very high torque density ( [36] quoted Mekhiche, Program Director for hybrid drive solutions, BAE Systems, U.K.: "Rare-earth magnets allow for lighter motors with higher torque-between 30% and 60% less weight than equivalent induction motors, with an increase in efficiency of 5% or more."). A commercial review of the different drive systems was given in [37], although here, the machines are addressed from a technical viewpoint; [38] also reviewed some of the basic automotive drive and motor topologies used. They quoted power density and efficiency in several types of motors as follows: brushed dc 2.5, IM 3.5, IPMSM 5, and SRM 3.5 on an arbitrary scale up to 5.…”
Section: E Magnetless Motor Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The perception is that rare-earth brushless PM motors offer very high torque density ( [36] quoted Mekhiche, Program Director for hybrid drive solutions, BAE Systems, U.K.: "Rare-earth magnets allow for lighter motors with higher torque-between 30% and 60% less weight than equivalent induction motors, with an increase in efficiency of 5% or more."). A commercial review of the different drive systems was given in [37], although here, the machines are addressed from a technical viewpoint; [38] also reviewed some of the basic automotive drive and motor topologies used. They quoted power density and efficiency in several types of motors as follows: brushed dc 2.5, IM 3.5, IPMSM 5, and SRM 3.5 on an arbitrary scale up to 5.…”
Section: E Magnetless Motor Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [38], vehicles that utilize an IM drive are listed: Renault Kangoo, Chevrolet Silverado, Daimler Chrysler Durango, and BMW 5. The obvious advantages to this type of machine are that they are cheap, robust, and have no PMs.…”
Section: Copper Cage Immentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constant-power region ends when the following high-speed region starts. Then with the square of the speed, the motor torque drops proportionally [23].…”
Section: Advanced Flux-weakening Control At High Speeds Required By Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As generally recognized, the use of electric vehicles (EVs) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] is effective in reducing the fossil energy consumption and carbon-dioxide emission. These goals will be more effectively achieved by using the EV as a movable energy storage device and performing its inter-connected operations to microgrid or utility grid [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%