2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12116-016-9230-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electoral Confidence and Political Budget Cycles in Non-OECD Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, pre-election opinion polling is not nearly as prevalent in SSA as in OECD countries, it is often plagued by measurement challenges and controversy (e.g., Heath, Fisher, and Smith 2005), and it is rarely conducted in diaspora communities. Thus, given low political information, prior electoral results are often the strongest signal available to incumbent parties (Eibl andLynge-Mangueira 2017, Somer-Topcu 2009). Where diaspora voter turnout results by party are available (n=47), I code Diaspora Support as equal to 2 for cases where the majority of the diaspora voted for incumbent party in the prior election and 0 in cases where the majority of diaspora voters supported the opposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, pre-election opinion polling is not nearly as prevalent in SSA as in OECD countries, it is often plagued by measurement challenges and controversy (e.g., Heath, Fisher, and Smith 2005), and it is rarely conducted in diaspora communities. Thus, given low political information, prior electoral results are often the strongest signal available to incumbent parties (Eibl andLynge-Mangueira 2017, Somer-Topcu 2009). Where diaspora voter turnout results by party are available (n=47), I code Diaspora Support as equal to 2 for cases where the majority of the diaspora voted for incumbent party in the prior election and 0 in cases where the majority of diaspora voters supported the opposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture the first factor, the MPs' fear of electoral defeat, I use Parliamentary win-margin t-1 , which measures the win-margin in the last parliamentary election. Past win-margins have been used as a measure of electoral confidence in other studies, and, in the context of information scarce environments, where pre-election polls are either unavailable or unreliable, have been found to perform better than other measures (Eibl & Lynge 2017). MPs in Ghana will most certainly use all information available to them when they gauge their electoral prospects.…”
Section: Variables and Model: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%