1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1003416323901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shannon et al [21] made a statistical analysis of the dependence of the surface roughness on the direction of the magnetic field. They observed that, for a horizontal magnetic field, the roughness increased, while it decreased for a vertical magnetic field.…”
Section: Nickel Electrodepositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shannon et al [21] made a statistical analysis of the dependence of the surface roughness on the direction of the magnetic field. They observed that, for a horizontal magnetic field, the roughness increased, while it decreased for a vertical magnetic field.…”
Section: Nickel Electrodepositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic field imposition (i.e. deposition via magnetoelectrolysis) has been shown to affect the crystal orientation of nickel films [1] via X-ray diffractometry as well as various morphological properties of the deposits [2][3][4]. In the case of simultaneous deposition of two magnetic materials the magnetic field effect is expected to (primarily) manifest itself in deposit structure, deposit composition and the fluctuating behaviour of current (potentiostatic deposition) or cell potential (galvanostatic deposition).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%