2009
DOI: 10.14361/9783839409596-intro
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Einleitung: Der Stoff, aus dem die Kopftuch-Konflikte sind

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, based on the principles of pluralism and tolerance and the freedom of religion or belief, attitudes that deviate from the societal norm must also get the possibility to be discussed in public -within the framework of European values, liberal democracy, and human rights, of course. In many European states, we can currently observe conflicts around the question of what the criteria are from which the limits of tolerance and the freedom of religion and belief should be drawn; most prominent are the conflicts about the wearing of headscarves in public or state institutions (Berghahn et al 2009). These conflicts are extremely politicised and fought out primarily on a legal level (see for example, the judgment of the European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) on 15 July 2021 on the wearing of any visible political, philosophical, or religious sign or the wearing of conspicuous, large-sized political, philosophical, or religious signs in the workplace, which requires the legitimacy of the policy of neutrality adopted by the employer and the need to establish economic loss suffered by the employer, see InfoCuria 2021).…”
Section: Values Education As a Public Social And Political Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, based on the principles of pluralism and tolerance and the freedom of religion or belief, attitudes that deviate from the societal norm must also get the possibility to be discussed in public -within the framework of European values, liberal democracy, and human rights, of course. In many European states, we can currently observe conflicts around the question of what the criteria are from which the limits of tolerance and the freedom of religion and belief should be drawn; most prominent are the conflicts about the wearing of headscarves in public or state institutions (Berghahn et al 2009). These conflicts are extremely politicised and fought out primarily on a legal level (see for example, the judgment of the European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) on 15 July 2021 on the wearing of any visible political, philosophical, or religious sign or the wearing of conspicuous, large-sized political, philosophical, or religious signs in the workplace, which requires the legitimacy of the policy of neutrality adopted by the employer and the need to establish economic loss suffered by the employer, see InfoCuria 2021).…”
Section: Values Education As a Public Social And Political Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%