2011 14th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design 2011
DOI: 10.1109/dsd.2011.68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Fault Simulation of SystemC Designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, for the affine representation the areas of the specification and the simulation result are compared, which provides a very similar result. The robustness would then be calculated as the left part of (16). However, as the affine simulation result is a range, the area can be easily described as the integral of the difference of upper and lower boundaries.…”
Section: B3 Affine Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, for the affine representation the areas of the specification and the simulation result are compared, which provides a very similar result. The robustness would then be calculated as the left part of (16). However, as the affine simulation result is a range, the area can be easily described as the integral of the difference of upper and lower boundaries.…”
Section: B3 Affine Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second step, the original instruction simulator is extended by an efficient concurrent and comparative Sys temC fault simulator [16], such that all faults in the fault space are simulated and classified in one simulation run. The details of the fault injection and propagation for each kind of instruction are shown in Table II.…”
Section: Evaluation Via Fault Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Lu@2011 [116] proposes the fault simulation in SystemC by concurrent and comparative simulation (CCS), which was originally applied in functional verification. CCS speeds up simulation by concurrent simulation of many machines with different fault configurations compared to a reference fault-free one.…”
Section: System-level Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%