2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient charge-transport UV sensor based on interlinked ZnO tetrapod networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers reported that enhanced charge separation can provide a progression in interfacial charge transfer for dyes adsorption and photocatalytic degradation improvement [29,30]. To improve UV photosensitivity and photocatalytic activity, this carrier concentration, carrier pathway, and charge recombination should be modified [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some researchers reported that enhanced charge separation can provide a progression in interfacial charge transfer for dyes adsorption and photocatalytic degradation improvement [29,30]. To improve UV photosensitivity and photocatalytic activity, this carrier concentration, carrier pathway, and charge recombination should be modified [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several efforts have been made to improve carrier concentration, to provide alternative carrier pathway and reduce charge recombination by tuning ZnO morphology, surface defect improvement [31,32,33,34,35], and combining ZnO with other functional materials, such as carbon-based graphene oxide (GO) [13] and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) [36,37]. GO, rGO, and graphene consist of sp2 hybridized carbon atoms arranged in two-dimensional honeycomb lattices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response (on/off) ratio or sensitivity is one of the key parameters of UV (and gas) sensors and was determined from resistance changes in ZnO samples tested in a dark chamber upon UV illumination. The sensitivity was calculated as: , where R UV was the maximum resistance measured when the sensor was exposed to UV radiation and R dark was the resistance measured prior to exposure of UV radiation [ 21 ]. Figure 4 shows the typical response curves for both the bulk ZnO–MP and T–ZnO as well as of thin films in terms of resistance in the dark and under two different UV illuminations (UV A, 365 nm and UV B, 302 nm) with an intensity of 1.4–1.6 mW/cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZnO morphology has been shown to play a significant role in controlling the sensing performance. For example, ZnO nanofiber- and nanowire-based sensors were found to display high responsivity toward UV radiation in ambient conditions [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8] In recent years, photodetectors based on SAW devices have received extensive attention. [9][10][11] For example, Pang et al fabricated a LiTaO 3 -based Love mode SAW ultraviolet (UV) sensor with ZnO top layer, 12 which was operated at a resonant frequency of 41.5 MHz, with a frequency shi of 150 kHz under 254 nm UV radiation at 350 mW cm À2 Zhou et al used MoS 2 nanosheets as the UV-sensitive layer for SAW photodetectors, 8 which showed a maximum frequency shi of 3.5 MHz under a 365 nm UV illumination at a power density of 1.466 mW cm À2 . However, there are few reports about visible-light sensors or infrared sensors based on the SAW devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%