2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of MY09/11 consensus PCR in the detection of multiple HPV infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MY09/ 11 has been shown to have lower sensitivity compared with other L1 consensus primer sets. 28,29 Owing to limitations of retrospective analyses, the significance of reported prevalence in this study is unclear. Risk factors, such as sexual history, were unable to be ascertained.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…MY09/ 11 has been shown to have lower sensitivity compared with other L1 consensus primer sets. 28,29 Owing to limitations of retrospective analyses, the significance of reported prevalence in this study is unclear. Risk factors, such as sexual history, were unable to be ascertained.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Each of these methods has some drawbacks, mainly in the area of reagents, cost effectiveness, time required, and false positive and negative results, especially in samples with lower copy numbers and mixed infections. Results of some surveys show that primers such as MY09/11 are ineffective due to increased mutations in HPV genome and multiple infections ( 65 - 66 ). Therefore, conventional PCR and other molecular methods should be improved in order to cover these new mutant types or to revise the screening methods by implementing other recommended molecular techniques for HPV detection and typing ( 61 , 65 , 66 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of some surveys show that primers such as MY09/11 are ineffective due to increased mutations in HPV genome and multiple infections ( 65 - 66 ). Therefore, conventional PCR and other molecular methods should be improved in order to cover these new mutant types or to revise the screening methods by implementing other recommended molecular techniques for HPV detection and typing ( 61 , 65 , 66 ). At present, valid genotyping procedures available commercially and in-house methods are approved in WHO proficiency testing, and could be considered as the best practical way for primary HPV testing in cervical cancer screening plans ( 10 , 66 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human β-globin housekeeping gene (248-bp) HMBB01 5ʹ-GCG ACC CAA TGC AAA TTG GT-3ʹ PC04 5ʹ-GAA GAG CCA AGG ACA GGT AC-3ʹ GH20 5ʹ-CAA CTT CAT CCA CGT TCA CC-3ʹ (11.6%); HPV-18, 7 (7.4%); HPV-31, 7 (7.4%); HPV-35, 7 (7.4%); HPV-68, 6 (6.3%); HPV-33, 4 (4.2%); HPV-82, 4 (4.2%); HPV-39, 3 (3.2%); and HPV-45, 2 (2.1%) (31). In this study, types 52 and 58 are more prevalent than type 18, which is different from the results of our study and the studies we compared our study with.…”
Section: Type Primersmentioning
confidence: 99%