2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of crustal superfluid neutrons in pulsar glitch models

Abstract: In order to assess the ability of purely crust-driven glitch models to match the observed glitch activity in the Vela pulsar, we conduct a systematic analysis of the dependence of the fractional moment of inertia of the inner crustal neutrons on the stiffness of the nuclear symmetry energy at saturation density L. We take into account both crustal entrainment and the fact that only a fraction Y g of the core neutrons may couple to the crust on the glitch-rise timescale. We use a set of consistently-generated c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only reasonable constraint on mass of Vela pulsar is that it should exceed about one solar mass according to core-collapse supernova simulations. Therefore, the present calculations suggest that without entrainment, the crust is enough to explain the Vela glitch data and with entrainment, the crust is not enough since the mass of Vela pulsar would be below one solar mass ( Fig.-5), in accordance with other studies [70][71][72][73][74].…”
Section: β-Equilibrated Neutron Star Mattersupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The only reasonable constraint on mass of Vela pulsar is that it should exceed about one solar mass according to core-collapse supernova simulations. Therefore, the present calculations suggest that without entrainment, the crust is enough to explain the Vela glitch data and with entrainment, the crust is not enough since the mass of Vela pulsar would be below one solar mass ( Fig.-5), in accordance with other studies [70][71][72][73][74].…”
Section: β-Equilibrated Neutron Star Mattersupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The other factor is I c . There are two popular scenarios for this quantity, as discussed in Section 3 of Melatos et al (2015): (a) if the crust is a thin crystalline lattice and the rest of the star is composed of a superfluid we have I c /I 0 ∼ 10 −2 , where I 0 is the total moment of inertia of the star (Andersson et al 2012;Hooker et al 2015); (b) if the crust has most of the interior superfluid pinned and co-rotating with it (via magnetic flux tubes or charged particles), with only a bit of the inner crust superfluid decoupled, we have I c /I 0 ∼ 1 (Link et al 1999;Lyne et al 2000;Espinoza et al 2011). We do not explore which of these scenarios is more likely, as both have strong support in the literature.…”
Section: Population Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work by Chamel (2012) adds weight to the latter scenario by showing that the effective neutron mass characterizing nondissipative entrainment is significantly larger than the bare neutron mass, implying decreased superfluid mobility relative to the crustal lattice. Hence the angular momentum reservoir is larger than the inner crust superfluid can provide, according to most nuclear theories (Andersson et al 2012;Hooker et al 2015). A key unknown facing both scenarios is how strongly neutron vortices pin to magnetic fluxoids in the core.…”
Section: » W W~-| |mentioning
confidence: 99%