1972
DOI: 10.1093/bja/44.4.401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Cricoid Pressure in Preventing Aspiration of Gastric Contents in Paediatric Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths highlighted the danger of aspiration during Cesarian section in the UK and the use of RSI has been the norm for all emergency surgery where the patient is thought to have a full stomach. Salem et al (5) reported the efficacy of cricoid pressure in children in 1972. At this time there were few alternatives for preventing aspiration, however, the risks associated with the use of suxamethonium, especially in children, have since become apparent (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths highlighted the danger of aspiration during Cesarian section in the UK and the use of RSI has been the norm for all emergency surgery where the patient is thought to have a full stomach. Salem et al (5) reported the efficacy of cricoid pressure in children in 1972. At this time there were few alternatives for preventing aspiration, however, the risks associated with the use of suxamethonium, especially in children, have since become apparent (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two LOE 5 studies 170,171 showed that cricoid pressure may reduce gastric inflation in children. One LOE 5 study in children 172 and 1 LOE 5 study in adult cadavers 173 demonstrated that esophageal reflux is reduced with cricoid pressure.…”
Section: Airway and Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salem subsequently reported the efficacy of cricoid pressure in children, in 1972. [18] At that time there were few alternatives for preventing aspiration, however, the risks associated with the use of suxamethonium, especially in children, have become apparent and with more agents available to improve the intubating conditions, many anaesthetists are avoiding the use of suxamethonium. [19]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%