We assessed limit to cardiac compensation during isovolemic hemodilution (HD) in 14 anesthetized dogs. Radioactive microspheres were used to evaluate myocardial blood flow (MBF) and its transmural distribution (endo/epi). Myocardial O2 consumption (MVO2) and percent lactate extraction were determined. Coronary vasodilator reserve was assessed from reactive hyperemic responses. Dogs were divided into group 1, with intact left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and group 2, with critical stenosis of LAD. Measurements were obtained at baseline and during graded HD (Hespan) until cardiac failure (CF). CF occurred at lower hematocrit in group 1 compared with group 2 (9 +/- 1 vs. 17 +/- 1%). In group 1, MBF increased during HD to maintain MVO2 constant; increases in MBF were transmurally uniform until CF, when decreased endo/epi and lactate production suggested subendocardial ischemia. Coronary vasodilator reserve decreased progressively during HD and was absent at CF. In group 2, stenotic LAD demonstrated constant MBF (resulting in decreased MVO2) during HD. At CF, these responses along with reduced endo/epi and lactate production indicated local myocardial ischemia. We conclude that 1) with normal coronary circulation, cardiac function was well maintained over a wide range of hematocrits because increases in MBF were transmurally uniform and sufficient to maintain myocardial oxygenation: CF occurred during extreme HD when MBF became maldistributed, resulting in subendocardial ischemia; 2) critical coronary stenosis impaired coronary vascular adjustment to HD and reduced significantly tolerance of left ventricle to HD; and 3) present findings underscore the importance of recruitment of coronary vasodilator reserve in preserving total and regional myocardial oxygenation during HD.

Preoxygenation before anesthetic induction and tracheal intubation is a widely accepted maneuver, designed to increase the body oxygen stores and thereby delay the onset of arterial hemoglobin desaturation during apnea. Because difficulties with ventilation and intubation are unpredictable, the need for preoxygenation is desirable in all patients. During emergence from anesthesia, residual effects of anesthetics and inadequate reversal of neuromuscular blockade can lead to hypoventilation, hypoxemia, and loss of airway patency. In accordance, routine preoxygenation before the tracheal extubation has also been recommended. The objective of this article is to discuss the physiologic basis, clinical benefits, and potential concerns about the use of preoxygenation. The effectiveness of preoxygenation is assessed by its efficacy and efficiency. Indices of efficacy include increases in the fraction of alveolar oxygen, increases in arterial oxygen tension, and decreases in the fraction of alveolar nitrogen. End points of maximal preoxygenation (efficacy) are an end-tidal oxygen concentration of 90% or an end-tidal nitrogen concentration of 5%. Efficiency of preoxygenation is reflected in the rate of decline in oxyhemoglobin desaturation during apnea. All investigations have demonstrated that maximal preoxygenation markedly delays arterial hemoglobin desaturation during apnea. This advantage may be blunted in high-risk patients. Various maneuvers have been introduced to extend the effect of preoxygenation. These include elevation of the head, apneic diffusion oxygenation, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and/or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), bilevel positive airway pressure, and transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange. The benefit of apneic diffusion oxygenation is dependent on achieving maximal preoxygenation, maintaining airway patency, and the existence of a high functional residual capacity to body weight ratio. Potential risks of preoxygenation include delayed detection of esophageal intubation, absorption atelectasis, production of reactive oxygen species, and undesirable hemodynamic effects. Because the duration of preoxygenation is short, the hemodynamic effects and the accumulation of reactive oxygen species are insufficient to negate its benefits. Absorption atelectasis is a consequence of preoxygenation. Two approaches have been proposed to reduce the absorption atelectasis during preoxygenation: a modest decrease in the fraction of inspired oxygen to 0.8, and the use of recruitment maneuvers, such as CPAP, PEEP, and/or a vital capacity maneuver (all of which are commonly performed during the administration of anesthesia). Although a slight decrease in the fraction of inspired oxygen reduces atelectasis, it does so at the expense of a reduction in the protection afforded during apnea.

Since cricoid pressure was introduced into clinical practice, controversial issues have arisen, including necessity, effectiveness in preventing aspiration, quantifying the cricoid force, and its reliability in certain clinical entities and in the presence of gastric tubes. Cricoid pressure–associated complications have also been alleged, such as airway obstruction leading to interference with manual ventilation, laryngeal visualization, tracheal intubation, placement of supraglottic devices, and relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. This review synthesizes available information to identify, address, and attempt to resolve the controversies related to cricoid pressure. The effective use of cricoid pressure requires that the applied force is sufficient to occlude the esophageal entrance while avoiding airway-related complications. Most of these complications are caused by excessive or inadequate force or by misapplication of cricoid pressure. Because a simple-to-use and reliable cricoid pressure device is not commercially available, regular training of personnel, using technology-enhanced cricoid pressure simulation, is required. The current status of cricoid pressure and objectives for future cricoid pressure–related research are also discussed.