2005
DOI: 10.1521/suli.2005.35.3.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Brief Telephone Psychotherapy with Callers to a Suicide Hotline

Abstract: The efficacy of two types of theapy conducted exclusively over the telephone was studied. Clients (N=55) were recruited from a pool of callers to a suicide hotline and were randomly assigned to a waiting list control (WC) or Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) or Common Factors Therapy (CFT). It was hypothesized that improvements would be significantly higher in the two therapy conditions compared to the waitlist control and SFBT would be significantly more efficacious than CFT. Results confirmed that improv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intervention completion rates were lower in our study relative to some other trials of webbased treatments for depression 26 but not of other telephone-based services. 3 The reasons for this are unclear. The current trial was a true effectiveness trial employing a volunteer workforce for recruitment and call back, and hence might be expected to be associated with greater recruitment and adherence problems relative to the more controlled environment of an efficacy study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intervention completion rates were lower in our study relative to some other trials of webbased treatments for depression 26 but not of other telephone-based services. 3 The reasons for this are unclear. The current trial was a true effectiveness trial employing a volunteer workforce for recruitment and call back, and hence might be expected to be associated with greater recruitment and adherence problems relative to the more controlled environment of an efficacy study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Author affiliations 1 School of Medicine, The Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2 Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia 3 Orygen Youth Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study focused on mildly depressed college students [22] and found that one session of SFBT was as effective as one session of interpersonal therapy with a significant decrease in depressive symptoms. Other studies on SFBT with adult populations showed that SFBT was related to a reduction of depressive symptoms over time, and comparable outcomes to short-term psychodynamic therapy [23], past-focused treatment [24], common factors therapy [25], and a treatment based on the Hazeldon model in a group of substance abusers [26]. None of these studies were about Web-based interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in a comprehensive literature review Corcoran and Pillai (2009) found that solution-focused approaches were effective for a wide range of therapeutic situations including marriage counselling (Zimmerman, Prest, & Wetzel, 1997), suicide prevention interventions (Rhee, Merbaum, Strube, & Self, 2005), criminal offending (Lindforss & Magnusson, 1997), and with caregivers of people with chronic schizophrenia (eakes, Walsh, Markowksi, Cain, & Swanson, 1997). other reviews of solution-focused counselling and therapeutic interventions have found solution-focused approaches to be effective in relation to enhancing parenting skills and dealing with anxiety, stress, and depression (e.g., Kim, 2008;Stams, Dekovic, Buist, & de Vries, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%