2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of a live attenuated influenza vaccine in adults 60 years of age and older

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 21 studies in the elderly that were reviewed comprised four randomized and two non‐randomized controlled trials, seven cohort studies, four case–controls and four ecological studies. Seasonal influenza vaccination provided 43–58% protection in the elderly 18, 42, 43. The seven studies in healthy adults comprised one randomized controlled trial, and three cohorts and case–control studies each.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 21 studies in the elderly that were reviewed comprised four randomized and two non‐randomized controlled trials, seven cohort studies, four case–controls and four ecological studies. Seasonal influenza vaccination provided 43–58% protection in the elderly 18, 42, 43. The seven studies in healthy adults comprised one randomized controlled trial, and three cohorts and case–control studies each.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[225] In South Africa, a randomized placebo-controlled trial in 2001 estimated LAIV efficacy against vaccine-matched influenza viruses to be 42.3%, with highest efficacy against influenza A(H3N2) viruses (52.5%), no efficacy against influenza B viruses, and no increase of severe adverse events for LAIV recipients compared to placebo. [226] A superiority trial in South Africa in 2002 found no significant difference in relative efficacy between LAIV and TIV, although this was due in part to the small number of laboratory-confirmed infections in the two study arms. [227] Finally, a study among Russian adults aged 60 and over who received either TIV or LAIV alone or a combination of the two, found a similar efficacy when TIV or LAIV was administered alone, at 50% and 51% respectively.…”
Section: Vaccine Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other trials have reported a low incidence of adverse effects (0%-3%) and no significant difference in serious adverse events between influenza vaccine and placebo. [15][16][17] Of the RCTs, FLUCAD 31 was likely the most well designed. The authors attempted to minimize bias and confounding through appropriate randomization, use of intention-to-treat analyses, and minimal loss to follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 However, in prospective randomized trials that included CV outcomes for safety assessment, influenza vaccination was not associated with a reduction in CV events, [15][16][17][18] although these trials were limited by low event rates and potential for misclassification. 19 Both the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology recommend the influenza vaccine annually for individuals with established CVD [20][21][22] without specifically stating that the purpose is to reduce the risk of CV events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%