2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2011.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of using air temperature as a proxy for potential evapotranspiration in climate change scenarios of Great Lakes basin hydrology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
85
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies such as Lofgren et al (2011), or the more recent Milly and Dunne (2016), further simplified Eq. (3) to:…”
Section: Methods Based On Radiation 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies such as Lofgren et al (2011), or the more recent Milly and Dunne (2016), further simplified Eq. (3) to:…”
Section: Methods Based On Radiation 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. Menzel, 2008;Lofgren et al, 2011), or (iii) used the Penman-Monteith method as the benchmark to test different alternative Ep formulations that require less input data (e.g. Chen et al, 2005;Sentelhas et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed by Lofgren et al (2011), traditional hydrological models using this approach project an exaggerated evapotranspiration increase for future climate, and consequently runoff reduction, because of the absence of surface energy budget constraints in these models. Another important issue is that the AHPS does not account for the two-way exchange of energy and water between the Great Lakes basin and the overlying atmosphere, and therefore fails to capture important feedback processes occurring at the landand lake-atmosphere interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is essential remarking that the overall driver of PET and temperature as well is net solar radiation, which is a portion of the extraterrestrial one. Furthermore, the correlation between PET and temperature is so much significant only at coarse time scales, such as the annual one, while its correlation with the solar radiation remains significant, at all temporal scales [40]. …”
Section: Which Meteorological Drivers Explain Mean Annual Pet Over Thmentioning
confidence: 97%