1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(89)80053-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of two hemostatic agents on osseous healing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings confirm those obtained by other authors. 9,11 The results indicate that the haemostatic agents assessed in this study can be used in oral surgeries; however, there is a strong recommendation for the total removal of the material 5 to 10 minutes after application, because the presence of material residues can induce an inflammatory response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These findings confirm those obtained by other authors. 9,11 The results indicate that the haemostatic agents assessed in this study can be used in oral surgeries; however, there is a strong recommendation for the total removal of the material 5 to 10 minutes after application, because the presence of material residues can induce an inflammatory response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…11,20 Thus, small amounts of residual haemostatic agent material were observed in some specimens 7 and 14 days after surgery, but they neither induced an inflammatory response 8,9,14 nor harmed the osseous repair in the 30-and 45-day postoperative periods as they were resorbed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gelatin was completely resorbed and healing was complete at 120 days [20]. MFC did not impair bone formation in rat tibias in the Haasch study of 1989 [16]. Alberius et al studied the effect of bone wax on rabbit cranial bone lesions.…”
Section: Animal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%