2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra02380d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the surface chemistry and structure of carbon nanotubes on the coating of glucose oxidase and electrochemical biosensors performance

Abstract: Glucose oxidase has been immobilized on multiwall and herringbone carbon nanotubes for glucose biosensing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Glycerol reacts with the glycerol-3-kinase (GK) and gets converted to to glycerol-3-phosphate which then serves as the substrate for glycerol-3-phosphate oxidase to form dihydroxyacetonephosphate and H 2 O 2 ( Figure 5B). The redox potential of H 2 O 2 is about 0.4 V. [4,26,31] The other potential contributor to the redox signal is FAD whose redox potential also has been reported between 0.4-0.5 V. [46] We did not observe any redox peak at that potential in the present study. Instead, we have observed a redox peak between 0.2 to 0.3 V which is attributed to the redox potential of FAD.…”
Section: Electrochemical Measurementssupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Glycerol reacts with the glycerol-3-kinase (GK) and gets converted to to glycerol-3-phosphate which then serves as the substrate for glycerol-3-phosphate oxidase to form dihydroxyacetonephosphate and H 2 O 2 ( Figure 5B). The redox potential of H 2 O 2 is about 0.4 V. [4,26,31] The other potential contributor to the redox signal is FAD whose redox potential also has been reported between 0.4-0.5 V. [46] We did not observe any redox peak at that potential in the present study. Instead, we have observed a redox peak between 0.2 to 0.3 V which is attributed to the redox potential of FAD.…”
Section: Electrochemical Measurementssupporting
confidence: 46%
“…The larger electrochemical flow cell is shown in Figure 3A, where the VACNT sensor was held between two, size- the O 2 reduction current. 45 However, at low potentials the PNU-VACNTs produced a very large negative current from the reduction of oxygen, making it unreasonable to operate at low potentials in the presence of oxygen (oxygen is required for the GOx reaction).…”
Section: Flow Cell Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also shown inFigure 4is current density with flow rate for 10 µM of ascorbic acid (AA, Fisher Scientific) at a potential of 0.55 V vs. Ag/AgCl (same as GOx tests),as tested with each of the GOx sensors (Pt only, EDC/NHS, and PEDOT). The current density from this interfering species was rather large because AA oxidizes readily at this potential 45. This was especially significant for the low current densities of EDC/NHS and PEDOT sensors at high flow rates, which is the main reason to operate the functionalized sensors at a low flow rate (1 mL/min).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material science and protein engineering develop approaches to overcome those limitations. Material science focuses on the modification of the enzyme–electrode interface for improved electrochemical communication (du Toit & Di Lorenzo, ; Gonzalez‐Gaitan et al, ; Haghighi, Hallaj, & Salimi, ; Husain, ; Li et al, ; Mano et al, ; M. Zhang et al, ; Pourasl et al, ; Sağlam et al, ; Shrestha et al, ; Suganthi et al, ; Tian et al, ; Zhu et al, ). Protein engineering aims to optimize the enzyme toward specific needs and to gain knowledge about the involved mechanisms on a molecular level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First generation glucose sensors were able to detect either a pH-shift caused by gluconic acid formation, oxygen consumption (Clark & Lyons, 1962), or hydrogen peroxide formation (Clark & Clark, 1973). Since then, intensive research on the direct electrochemical communication between redox enzyme and electrode took place (González-Gaitán, Ruiz-Rosas, Morallón, & Cazorla-Amorós, 2017;Mano et al, 2002;Pourasl et al, 2014;Zhu et al, 2012). These third generation biosensors are composed of electrodes (e.g., glassy carbon electrode, porous gold electrode, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%