2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-019-01375-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the nitrification inhibitor DMPP (3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate) on gross N transformation rates and N2O emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, DMPP has the potential to be a good nitrification inhibitor in agricultural management practices. A previous study found that DMPP decreased gross soil autotrophic nitrification rates and reduced gross mineralization rates through feedback regulation (Zhu et al, 2019). DMPP application reduced the risk of nitrate leaching and N losses due to denitrification and did not increase NH 3 volatilization (Zerulla et al, 2001;Li et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, DMPP has the potential to be a good nitrification inhibitor in agricultural management practices. A previous study found that DMPP decreased gross soil autotrophic nitrification rates and reduced gross mineralization rates through feedback regulation (Zhu et al, 2019). DMPP application reduced the risk of nitrate leaching and N losses due to denitrification and did not increase NH 3 volatilization (Zerulla et al, 2001;Li et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The effectiveness of the nitrification inhibitors can be affected by soil properties such as soil water content (Barrena et al 2017), and soil organic matter and clay content (Zhu et al 2019). Zhu et al (2019) reported that the efficiency of DMPP in reducing nitrification and N 2 O emissions was lower in soils with high organic matter and clay contents, likely due to the high rates of adsorption of DMPP by soil organic matter and clay.…”
Section: Synthetic Nitrification Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of the nitrification inhibitors can be affected by soil properties such as soil water content (Barrena et al 2017), and soil organic matter and clay content (Zhu et al 2019). Zhu et al (2019) reported that the efficiency of DMPP in reducing nitrification and N 2 O emissions was lower in soils with high organic matter and clay contents, likely due to the high rates of adsorption of DMPP by soil organic matter and clay. The effectiveness of DCD in reducing N 2 O emissions from urine patches in New Zealand is highly season-specific, with reductions of 52, 39 and 16% in autumn, spring and summer, respectively, but DCD application increased NH 3 emissions by 56, 9 and 17% in the respective seasons (Zaman et al 2009).…”
Section: Synthetic Nitrification Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DMPP capacity to reduce nitrification rates and N 2 O emissions has been well established [52][53][54], the effects on soil N gross rates (especially ammonification rates) have been poorly investigated as well as the combined effects with natural zeolites in soil. One of the few examples is [55], where a general increase of mineralization of recalcitrant organic N after DMPP addition in two soils was observed, beside a reduction in gross nitrification and N 2 O emissions. DMPP as an organic molecule can decompose and hence provide a source of C for microorganisms that may further stimulate mineralization processes.…”
Section: Zeolitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil organic C content and amount of clay minerals can also play a role in the performance of DMPP as a consequence of sorption-effects [56]. High sorption of DMPP may result in a lower availability to microorganisms and hence to a lower efficiency; the authors of [55,57,58] evaluated the effects of natural and NH 4 + -charged CHA-zeolite on the sorption of DMPP in soil and concluded that the soil was more efficient in binding DMPP, thanks to the presence of higher levels of organic C that favored the sorption of DMPP. The CHA-zeolite contained in the tuff could not, therefore, retain DMPP by ion exchange processes but instead brought mostly to a reduction in the overall sorption capacity of the soil, due to their lack of organic C. This outcome speculates if this lower sorption capacity in zeolite amended soils also affects the availability of DMPP to soil microbial biomass and consequently the overall efficiency in inhibiting nitrification.…”
Section: Zeolitesmentioning
confidence: 99%