2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2022.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the FIFA 11+ program on performance, biomechanical measures, and physiological responses: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some limitations in the present study. It has been suggested to achieve a positive and significant effect on biomechanical measures long-term programs should be applied 38 but the duration of the current study intervention was 8 weeks which may not be enough to make positive changes in all variables. It is possible that the results of this study may not be applicable in other ages group because there is some evidence that training protocols which neuromuscular components such as 11 + warm-up programs are most effective in adolescent populations 39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are some limitations in the present study. It has been suggested to achieve a positive and significant effect on biomechanical measures long-term programs should be applied 38 but the duration of the current study intervention was 8 weeks which may not be enough to make positive changes in all variables. It is possible that the results of this study may not be applicable in other ages group because there is some evidence that training protocols which neuromuscular components such as 11 + warm-up programs are most effective in adolescent populations 39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are some limitations in the present study. It has been suggested to achieve a positive and signi cant effect on biomechanical measures long-term programs should be applied 40 but the duration of the current study intervention was 8 weeks which may not be enough to make positive changes in all variables. It is possible that the results of this study may not be applicable in other ages group because there is some evidence that training protocols which neuromuscular components such as 11+ warm-up programs are most effective in adolescent populations 41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Further, a lack of clarity exists regarding the effects of the 11+ on technical abilities and physical performance [12,[24][25][26][27]. Although it is widely accepted that an appropriate warm-up programme should improve performance [28], more recent studies indicated that the 11+ programme does not improve players' performance acutely but may reduce sprinting and agility compared to a dynamic warm-up programme.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, in men’s subelite football, it reduces injury burden by up to 40% [ 10 ]. However, the efficacy of the 11+ in the prevention of ankle and groin injuries [ 6 , 7 , 11 ] and players’ performance [ 12 ] has remained questionable. The latter, in addition to barriers such as prolonged duration, concerns regarding some exercises, and lack of a link to football-specific targets [ 13 , 14 ], has been discussed as a potential reason for low compliance and less application of the programme [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%