2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: An eye-movement study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
25
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
25
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of both experiments showed worse performance for words with high-frequency first syllables. In a lexical decision task performed by Germanspeakers, Hutzler and colleagues also observed an inhibitory effect of syllable frequency on eye-movement measures (number of fixations, duration of the first fixation and gaze duration; Hutzler, Conrad, & Jacobs, 2005). Finally, electrophysiological evidence of the inhibitory effect has been also obtained with German-speakers (Hutzler et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of both experiments showed worse performance for words with high-frequency first syllables. In a lexical decision task performed by Germanspeakers, Hutzler and colleagues also observed an inhibitory effect of syllable frequency on eye-movement measures (number of fixations, duration of the first fixation and gaze duration; Hutzler, Conrad, & Jacobs, 2005). Finally, electrophysiological evidence of the inhibitory effect has been also obtained with German-speakers (Hutzler et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…One diagnostic criterion for such measures is sensitivity to whole-word frequency. Both eye fixation and electrophysiological measures meet this criterion, and yield inhibitory influences of syllable frequency (Barber et al, 2004;Hutzler et al, 2004Hutzler et al, , 2005. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An inhibitory effect was found, high syllable-frequency (HSF) words being processed more slowly than low syllable-frequency (LSF) words. Since that first report, the effect has been replicated in several languages: Spanish (Alvarez, Carreiras, & Taft, 2001;Conrad, Carreiras, & Jacobs, 2008;Conrad, Carreiras, Tamm, & Jacobs, 2009), French (Chetail & Mathey, 2009;Conrad, Grainger, & Jacobs, 2007; see also Mathey & Zagar, 2002) and German Hutzler, Conrad, & Jacobs, 2005;Stenneken, Conrad, & Jacobs, 2007). At a theoretical level, the effect has been accounted for in terms of competition among candidate words sharing the initial syllable (Carreiras et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…an effect of the number of syllables in naming and lexical decision latencies for visually presented words has been shown in english (an irregular but not syllable-stressed language; Jared & Seidenberg, 1993;new et al, 2006), in french (an irregular and syllable-stressed language; ferrand, 2000; ferrand & new, 2003), and in german (a regular but not syllable-stressed language; Stenneken, 2007). additional support for the involvement of syllables in reading comes from syllable frequency studies conducted in Spanish (Álvarez, carreiras, & perea, 2004), german (hutzler, conrad, & Jacobs, 2005), and english (macizo & van petten, 2007; ashby & rayner, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%