Abstract:a b s t r a c tSeveral empirical lines of investigation support the idea that syllable-sized units may be involved in visual word recognition processes. In this perspective, the present study aimed at investigating further the nature of the process that causes syllabic effects in reading. To do so, the syllable frequency effect was investigated in French using event related potentials while participants performed a lexical decision task (Experiment 1). Consistent with previous studies, manipulating the frequen… Show more
“…For example, Holcomb, Grainger, and O'Rourke (2002) demonstrated that words with small neighborhood size elicited larger amplitude in P200 than words with large neighborhood size did, and reading words with large neighborhood size elicited larger amplitude in N400 than reading words with small neighborhood size. Similar results have been demonstrated in studies of reading disyllabic words in Spanish, French and Basque (Barber, Vergara, & Carreiras, 2004;Chetail, Colin, & Content, 2012;VergaraMartinez, Dunabeitia, Laka, & Carreiras, 2009), and in reading Chinese characters (Hsu et al, 2009;Kong et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2007;Su, Mak, Cheung, & Law, 2012;Wu, Mo, Tsang, & Chen, 2012). In summary, these findings imply that the P200 might be associated with the early activation of orthographically/ phonologically similar words in the sublexical process.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The times between 150 and 300 ms were chosen to span a window within which effects have been associated with processing sublexical orthography and phonology, as reported in the electrophysiology literature (e.g. Chetail et al, 2012). Next, the response latency for the ROIs was defined as the latency with the largest dSPM values, and we employed the Desikan-Killiany gyral atlas (Desikan et al, 2006) to identify the anatomical location for each ROIs.…”
Section: Regions Of Interests (Rois) and Statistical Analysismentioning
“…For example, Holcomb, Grainger, and O'Rourke (2002) demonstrated that words with small neighborhood size elicited larger amplitude in P200 than words with large neighborhood size did, and reading words with large neighborhood size elicited larger amplitude in N400 than reading words with small neighborhood size. Similar results have been demonstrated in studies of reading disyllabic words in Spanish, French and Basque (Barber, Vergara, & Carreiras, 2004;Chetail, Colin, & Content, 2012;VergaraMartinez, Dunabeitia, Laka, & Carreiras, 2009), and in reading Chinese characters (Hsu et al, 2009;Kong et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2007;Su, Mak, Cheung, & Law, 2012;Wu, Mo, Tsang, & Chen, 2012). In summary, these findings imply that the P200 might be associated with the early activation of orthographically/ phonologically similar words in the sublexical process.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The times between 150 and 300 ms were chosen to span a window within which effects have been associated with processing sublexical orthography and phonology, as reported in the electrophysiology literature (e.g. Chetail et al, 2012). Next, the response latency for the ROIs was defined as the latency with the largest dSPM values, and we employed the Desikan-Killiany gyral atlas (Desikan et al, 2006) to identify the anatomical location for each ROIs.…”
Section: Regions Of Interests (Rois) and Statistical Analysismentioning
“…amplitudes observed in the current study are consistent with the interpretation that the requirement for attentional processing decreases over time with LDT learning. Alternatively, drawing from evidence of sublexical processing P200 effects [65][66][67] , our results may indicate altered reliance on sublexical processing during visual word recognition. These possibilities should be considered in future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Studies have found an inverse relationship between frontal P200 amplitude and the degree of supposed lexical activation that stems from early sublexical/syllable processing 62,[65][66] . For example, words with higher-frequency initial syllables are associated with weaker P200 amplitudes, compared to words with lowfrequency initial syllables, and are assumed to activate more of the lexicon during word recognition 65,67 . Conversely, greater P200 amplitudes were found when the colour boundary of a multicoloured word was mismatched from the syllable boundary, suggesting hindered syllable parsing and lexical activation 66 .…”
Visual word recognition is perceived to remain relatively stable throughout adulthood, but recent research suggests the system involved is malleable, with evidence of behavioural changes after lexical decision task (LDT) practice. The potential for, and extent of, neural changes have yet to be elucidated in this context. If identified, these neural changes could be due to processes associated with learning, where performance that is initially effortful becomes efficient and supported by an optimized task network. Replicating the British Lexicon Project, participants completed 16 hours of LDT learning over several days. We recorded EEG at three intervals to track neural change during LDT learning and assessed event-related potentials and brain signal complexity. We found that response times decreased during LDT learning, and there was evidence of neural change through N170, P200, N400, and LPC amplitudes across the EEG sessions, suggesting alterations to both the general cognitive and specific lexical processes involved in LDT performance. We also found widespread complexity decreases alongside localized increases, suggesting that processing became more automatic with specific increases in processing flexibility. These findings suggest that the visual word recognition system is dynamic, and has the potential for plastic changes to support more efficient and automatic task performance.
“…While it has been shown that sublexical characteristics like syllable-frequency as well as orthographic and phonological neighbourhood may affect the time course of print processing (e.g., Barber, Vergara, & Carreiras, 2004;Bürki, Cheneval, & Laganaro, 2015;Chetail, Colin, & Content, 2012;Hutzler et al, 2004), being restricted to a very small number of English words (see also Methods), we could not have controlled for all these potentially important linguistic factors of the stimuli. Hence, while studying early print processing we found it of utmost importance to control for lexical familiarity and visual complexity of the stimuli presented.…”
In the course of reading development children become familiar with letter strings and learn to distinguish between lexical and non-lexical items. In previous studies, the N1 component of the ERP was shown to reflect print tuning but also to be sensitive to lexical effects. It remains unclear, however, whether these two aspects of orthographic processing occur at the same time or in different time windows during the lengthy N1 component. Moreover, it is unclear whether these processes develop late or occur already at early stages of literacy acquisition and whether this is similar for native languages and languages acquired later in life. To address these questions, 27 children were tested longitudinally, i.e. before (mean: 7.6 years) and after one year of classroom-based English instruction. Additionally, 22 adult speakers of English as a foreign language (mean: 25.1 years) were investigated. A 128-channel EEG was recorded while participants performed a one-back task with native German words, English words, pseudowords and false-font strings. The event-related EEG analysis of early and late N1 phases revealed early effects related to print tuning and late effects related to lexical processing in the native, but not in the second language of adult readers. In the absence of lexicality effects in children, print tuning effects were found across both early and late N1 segments. The temporally distinct N1 sensitivities to print and lexicality reflect temporal dynamics of visual word processing, which seem to depend on reading expertise or maturation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.