2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.02.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of surface anisotropy on magnetic vortex core

Abstract: The vortex core shape in the three dimensional Heisenberg magnet is essentially influenced by a surface anisotropy. We predict that depending of the surface anisotropy type there appears barrel-or pillow-shaped deformation of the vortex core along the magnet thickness. Our theoretical study is well confirmed by spin-lattice simulations.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to (4b) the sign of the vortex core width gradient depends on the surface anisotropy type: barrelshaped for the ES surface anisotropy and pillow-shaped for the EN one. 44 Let us sketch the physical picture of the influence of the surface anisotropy on statics and dynamics using the particular case of ES surface anisotropy. The typical vortex core width w on a surface layer without magnetic field is determined by effective magnetic length eff , see (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to (4b) the sign of the vortex core width gradient depends on the surface anisotropy type: barrelshaped for the ES surface anisotropy and pillow-shaped for the EN one. 44 Let us sketch the physical picture of the influence of the surface anisotropy on statics and dynamics using the particular case of ES surface anisotropy. The typical vortex core width w on a surface layer without magnetic field is determined by effective magnetic length eff , see (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently we have studied how the surface anisotropy effects on the vortex core shape without magnetic field: there appears the pillowand the barrel-deformation of the core for the ES and EN anisotropies, respectively. 44 Qualitatively, the vortex core width inside the sample volume is determined by the magnetic length, while the core width on a surface layer is characterized by effective magnetic length 44…”
Section: B Magnets With the Surface Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of this system is described by a set of N vector Landau-Lifshitz ordinary differential equations, see ref. 59 for the general description of the SLaSi simulator and ref. 37 for details of the helix simulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The micromagnetic simulations are unique and powerful tool to study equilibrium magnetization states, their dynamics and responses to external perturbations (e.g., magnetic fields or spin-polarized currents) for arbitrary geometries, and in a wide range of time-and length-scales. The micromagnetic simulation packages are mostly based on the numerical solution of the LLG equation of motion, either using a finite difference method (FDM, e.g., OOMMF [185,186] and MuMax 3[187,188] for the submicrometer scale simulations and SLaSi, [189,190] Vampire [191,192] and Spirit [193,194] for atomistic simulations) or a finite element method (FEM, e.g., COMSOL Multiphysics [195] with the LLG extension, [196] Micromagnum, [197] magnum.fe, [198,199] magpar, [200,201] FastMag, [202,203] Nmag [204][205][206] and TetraMag [207] ). While the FDM approach is faster than the FEM and it could be used for the simulation of flat 2D curvilinear geometries, the FDM approach introduces errors and artifacts that can hinder the curvature-induced effects in the case of 3D curvilinear geometries, due to the step-like boundaries.…”
Section: Computer Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%