2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01345.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of supratherapeutic doses of ebastine and terfenadine on the QT interval

Abstract: Aims The objective of this study was to compare the effects of high doses of ebastine with terfenadine and placebo on QTc. Methods Thirty-two subjects were randomly assigned to four treatments (ebastine 60 mg day x1 , ebastine 100 mg day x1 , terfenadine 360 mg day x1 , placebo) administered for 7 days. Serial ECGs were performed at baseline and day 7 of each period. QT interval was analysed using both Bazett (QTcB) and Fridericia (QTcF) corrections. Results Ebastine 60 mg (+3.7 ms) did not cause a statistical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with placebo, mean heart rate increased significantly with ebastine (increase of 8-10 beats/min; P £ 0.002), but not with terfenadine (76). Ebastine was associated with a decrease in uncorrected QT interval, which was consistent with the increased heart rate seen in these groups.…”
Section: Cardiac Safetysupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with placebo, mean heart rate increased significantly with ebastine (increase of 8-10 beats/min; P £ 0.002), but not with terfenadine (76). Ebastine was associated with a decrease in uncorrected QT interval, which was consistent with the increased heart rate seen in these groups.…”
Section: Cardiac Safetysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It has been reported that BazettÕs formula may be inaccurate at describing the relationship between QTc and RR intervals, and it is possible that this formula overcorrected for heart rate in this study, leading to the significant difference in Bazett-corrected QTc interval seen in the ebastine 100 mg group (76). Additional analysis of the data from this study confirmed that the outcome for ebastine depended on the particular correction used, whereas results for terfenadine were largely independent of the formula (77).…”
Section: Cardiac Safetysupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, no significant QT c increase was observed in dose ranging studies [67,69]. In a study aiming to compare the effects of supratherapeutic doses of ebastine and terfenadine on the QT interval, ebastine at doses up to five times the recommended therapeutic dose did not cause clinically relevant changes in QTc interval [70].…”
Section: Ebastinementioning
confidence: 98%