Objective: Based on new understanding of nondopaminergic pathways involved in Parkinson's disease (PD) pathophysiology, a selective adenosine A 2A receptor antagonist, istradefylline, shows promise for the treatment of PD. Methods: Istradefylline (40mg/day) was studied in levodopa-treated PD subjects experiencing prominent wearing-off motor fluctuations. At 23 North American sites, 196 subjects were randomized in a double-blind, 12-week outpatient clinical trial of istradefylline (114 completing the trial) or placebo (58 completing the trial). The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to end point in the percentage of daily awake "off" time, recorded by subjects using a patient PD diary. Secondary end points evaluated "on" time (including "on time with dyskinesia"), the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement of Illness score. Clinical laboratory, electrocardiograms, vital signs, and adverse event monitoring comprised the safety monitoring. Results: After randomization, approximately 88% of subjects completed the double-blind period. Compared with baseline, the decrease of daily awake "off" time for istradefylline was a mean (Ϯ standard deviation) of Ϫ10.8 Ϯ 16.6% (95% confidence interval, Ϫ13.46 to Ϫ7.52) and for placebo, Ϫ4.0 Ϯ 15.7% (95% confidence interval, Ϫ7.73-0.31; p ϭ 0.007 using two-way analysis of variance). This effect corresponded to changes from baseline in total daily awake "off" time of Ϫ1.8 Ϯ 2.8 hours for istradefylline and Ϫ0.6 Ϯ 2.7 hours for placebo ( p ϭ 0.005). Treatment-emergent adverse effects with istradefylline were generally mild. Interpretation: Istradefylline was safe, well tolerated, and offered a clinically meaningful reduction in "off" time without increased troublesome dyskinesia. Neurol 2008;63:295-302 Although Parkinson's disease (PD) has several treatment options that initially can provide excellent symptomatic relief, 1 control of its disabilities typically declines over time. Because PD is characterized by loss of dopaminergic neurons projecting from substantia nigra to striatal nuclei, the most rational and effective therapy for restoring dopaminergic neurotransmission has been the dopamine precursor L-dopa. Ann2 Two years after starting L-dopa therapy, however, many patients start to experience fluctuations that interrupt control of parkinsonism, sometimes for up to several hours per day. 3,4 Adjusting the effects of L-dopa (by dosing changes or extenders such as catechol-Omethyltransferase or monoamine oxidase B inhibitors) or adding other dopaminergic drugs can improve "off" (undermedicated) states. Despite these options, inadequate control of motor fluctuations is a major source of disability for chronically treated PD.Beyond restoring dopaminergic input to striatal neurons, other pharmacological interventions can influence From the

Istradefylline demonstrated a significant reduction in the percentage of awake time per day spent in the OFF state, which resulted in a clinically meaningful reduction in OFF time, without an increase in ON time with troublesome dyskinesia, and was well tolerated as adjunctive treatment to levodopa in Parkinson disease.

Doxorubicin, either as a single agent or in combination regimens, is considered to be one of the most active chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. However, its clinical utility is limited by a cumulative, dose-dependent cardiac myopathy that can lead to potentially fatal congestive heart failure. Considerable research has gone into improving the therapeutic index of doxorubicin-based regimens. A new liposomal formulation of doxorubicin (Myocet, Elan Pharmaceuticals) has a significantly improved therapeutic index compared with conventional doxorubicin. The development of Myocet, a less cardiotoxic, better tolerated and equally efficacious doxorubicin, extends the therapeutic options in the overall management of breast cancer.

No abstract

Myocet (TLC D-99) is a liposomal formulation of the anti-neoplastic drug doxorubicin with an improved therapeutic index compared with conventional doxorubicin. The objective of this study was to assess the plasma disposition of doxorubicin when administered i.v. as TLC D-99 and to compare this to conventional drug. Metabolite (doxorubicinol) plasma levels were also quantitated in both treatment groups. Plasma was collected during the first course of treatment from 10 patients receiving TLC D-99 60 mg/m and 10 receiving conventional doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, each with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. Samples were assayed for total doxorubicin (all doxorubicin regardless of whether it is encapsulated or not), encapsulated doxorubicin (TLC D-99 group only) and doxorubicinol using high-performance liquid chromatography. Plasma concentrations of total doxorubicin were higher in patients receiving TLC D-99 than in patients receiving conventional doxorubicin. The clearance of total doxorubicin after administration of TLC D-99 was lower (approximately 9-fold) and the volume of distribution at steady state was less (25-fold) than that of doxorubicin after conventional drug. Doxorubicinol was detected in the plasma of all patients in both treatment groups. The mean AUC(0-infinity) of doxorubicinol for patients receiving TLC D-99 (1.5+/-0.4 M x h) was not statistically different than that in patients receiving conventional doxorubicin (1.8+/-0.4 M x h), although the appearance of the peak doxorubicinol concentration occurred later and was lower in patients receiving TLC D-99. There was a correlation between the plasma AUC(0-infinity) of total doxorubicin and the degree of myelosuppression in patients receiving conventional doxorubicin, but this correlation was not found in patients receiving TLC D-99.