2017
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2017.1157.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of spur or cane pruning on fruit composition of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that spur pruning influences the marketable yield by affecting cluster number rather than cluster or berry weight, as they did not vary significantly between the two training systems in both varieties. Similar results regarding the non-significant effect of the training system on berry quality and composition were previously reported [7]; however, others observed changes in berry composition when using different training systems [5,12]. Varieties respond differently to the pruning systems, so establishing a variety-specific standardization of pruning is crucial to sustaining its productivity and fruit quality [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It seems that spur pruning influences the marketable yield by affecting cluster number rather than cluster or berry weight, as they did not vary significantly between the two training systems in both varieties. Similar results regarding the non-significant effect of the training system on berry quality and composition were previously reported [7]; however, others observed changes in berry composition when using different training systems [5,12]. Varieties respond differently to the pruning systems, so establishing a variety-specific standardization of pruning is crucial to sustaining its productivity and fruit quality [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In the cane pruned vines, the basal half of the canes exhibited more blind buds and the growth patterns variability reduced as cane length decreased [6]. Spur-pruning of Cabernet Sauvignon vines resulted in higher shoot growth and pruning weight [7]. Moreover, a higher bud break percentage was noticed compared to cane pruning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Regarding the effect of spur or cane pruning on fruit composition of cabernet sauvignon grapes, Peppi and Kania found no significant differences in terms of both total phenol content and phenol composition of seeds. This observation led us to think that the pruning technique had only a limited effect on grape seed tannin content and composition . Furthermore, PA seed tannin content of corot noir grapes seems to be not affected by cluster or shoot thinning .…”
Section: Management Of Vine and Wine Practices: From Seed To Winementioning
confidence: 95%
“…This observation led us to think that the pruning technique had only a limited effect on grape seed tannin content and composition. 142 Furthermore, PA seed tannin content of corot noir grapes seems to be not affected by cluster or shoot thinning. 143 Concerning the impact of leaf removal and irrigation on agiorgitiko grape composition, Chorti et al have detected no significant differences in seed tannin content.…”
Section: Journal Of Agricultural and Food Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 96%