1965
DOI: 10.1007/bf00407863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of scopolamine and atropine and their quaternized salts on avoidance behavior in the monkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results, on this point, confirm previous observations concerning the disrupting effects of the antieholinergic drugs which do not occur with their methylderivatives, seen in several avoidance situations (Meyers et al, 1964;Samuel et al, 1965;Bohdanecky and Jarvik, 1967;Pradhan et al, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results, on this point, confirm previous observations concerning the disrupting effects of the antieholinergic drugs which do not occur with their methylderivatives, seen in several avoidance situations (Meyers et al, 1964;Samuel et al, 1965;Bohdanecky and Jarvik, 1967;Pradhan et al, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Analogous disrupting effects have been described in other experimental situations, i.e. for benactyzine in rats pretrained in a multiple T maze with a water reward (Domer and Schueler, 1960), for atropine and scopolamine in monkeys in three avoidance situations (Samuel et al, 1965), and for ditran, in various phases of the multiple schedule of reinforcement (Pradhan et al, 1968), in rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…tion, we also compared the effects of scopolamine and its quaternary derivative, scopolamine methyl nitrate. Quaternary derivatives of anticholinergic drugs penetrate the brain much less readily than their tertiary forms (Gairman & Pepeu, 1964;Paul-David, Riehl, & Unna, 1960) but have equal or greater potency with respect to peripheral effects (Goodman & Oilman, 1966;Gralun & Lazarus, 1940;Samuel, Kodama, &Mennear, 1965).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%