2007
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-95022007000300016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Protein and Energy Restricted Diet During Lactation Leads to Persistent Morphological Changes on Tibia Growth in the Weaned Pups

Abstract: FERNANDES, R. M. P.; ABREU, A. V.; SCHANAIDER, A.; SOARES JR., E. R.; PEÇANHA, G. C. A.; BABINSKI, M. A. & RAMOS, C. F. Effect of protein and energy restricted diet during lactation leads to persistent morphological changes on tibia growth in the weaned pups. Int. J. Morphol., 25(3):565-571, 2007. SUMMARY:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of maternal protein and energy restriction during lactation on the body weight and tibiae dimensions of pups at aging. At parturition, Wistar rat dams wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(37 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strengths of our study may be appreciated in its experimental design, the longitudinal nature of data collection, easy comparison to previous studies (Jones et al) using identical animal husbandry protocols Passos et al;Teixeira et al;Fernandes et al, 2007;Andrade et al), and simultaneous contrast of targeted and catch-up growth (Jones et al).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The strengths of our study may be appreciated in its experimental design, the longitudinal nature of data collection, easy comparison to previous studies (Jones et al) using identical animal husbandry protocols Passos et al;Teixeira et al;Fernandes et al, 2007;Andrade et al), and simultaneous contrast of targeted and catch-up growth (Jones et al).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Pregnant Wistar rats were separated at delivery into three groups: 1) control group (C) -with free access to a standard laboratory diet (in grams per 100 g) containing 23 % protein, 68 % carbohydrate, 5 % lipid, 4 % salts and 0.4 % vitamins, 17,038.7 total energy (kJ/kg); 2) protein-energy-restricted group (PER) -with free access to an isoenergetic, protein-restricted diet containing 8 % protein, and 3) energy-restricted group (ER) -fed with a standard laboratory diet in restricted quantities that was calculated based on average ingestion of the PER group. We have previously shown that the PER group consumed about 60 % of the amount consumed by the control group, despite having free access to food Teixeira et al;Fernandes et al, 2007Fernandes et al, , 2008Andrade et al). Hence, the ER and PER groups ingested essentially the same amount of food, which was measured every day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations