1995
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.79.12.1133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of posterior capsular disruption on the outcome of phacoemulsification surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed, in the complicated PCCC series, two cases of clinically significant cystoid macular oedema, which spontaneously regresses over a period of 6 months. Other authors did not mention occurrence of cystoid macular oedema in their series 19. Chambless found an incidence of 7% in phacoemulsification cases complicated by posterior capsule disruption 20…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We observed, in the complicated PCCC series, two cases of clinically significant cystoid macular oedema, which spontaneously regresses over a period of 6 months. Other authors did not mention occurrence of cystoid macular oedema in their series 19. Chambless found an incidence of 7% in phacoemulsification cases complicated by posterior capsule disruption 20…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, it should be borne in mind that, while posterior capsule rupture is undoubtedly associated with a poorer outcome in phacoemulsification surgery, 14 many patients have excellent visual outcome despite intraoperative posterior capsule rupture. 12 15 16 Also, other complications may occur, which may lead to adverse visual outcome such as wound leak, iris prolapse, suprachoroidal haemorrhage, or intraocular lens malposition. These potential adverse events may not be predicted using the potential complication scoring systems, but should be conveyed to the patient during consent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Capsular rupture is noted to occur in approximately 0.9% of cases. 2 Posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PC IOLs) have been considered the standard of care, while anterior chamber intraocular lenses (AC IOLs) have long been associated with intraocular inflammation, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, glaucoma, and lower visual acuity outcomes. [3][4][5] However, more recent studies have revealed a decrease in incidence of complications associated with redesigned, open-loop AC IOLs of the 1990s and beyond.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%