Effects Of Patent Pools On Innovation Investment Ex Ante Perspectives

Kwon, Youngkwan; Kim, Yeonbae; Kim, Tai-Yoo; Song, Yong-Il

doi:10.19030/jber.v6i7.2442

Cited by 3 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 10 publications

(12 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…11 We delegate the formal proof of our discussion to the appendix and state the main result of this analysis. patent pools charge lower overall license fees as they avoid royalty stacking.…”

Section: The Interplay Of the Demand Margin And Litigation Incentivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, they do not consider probabilistic patents and thus ligitation incentives are not their focus. Dequiedt and Veraevel (2013) and Kwon et al (2008) also analyze the e¤ects of patent pools on innovation incentives. However, these papers adopt ex ante perspectives and study the impact of possible pool formation on the incentives to innovate whereas we consider future development incentives by outsiders that arise ex post.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Patent pools, litigation, and innovation

Choi

Gerlach

2015

The RAND J of Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.

show abstract

Section: The Interplay Of the Demand Margin And Litigation Incentivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patent pools, litigation, and innovation

Choi

Gerlach

2015

The RAND J of Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such deviations are not possible in the equilibria of Cases 1 and 2 above. 11 We delegate the formal proof of our discussion to the appendix and state the main result of this analysis.…”

Section: The Interplay Of the Demand Margin And Litigation Incentivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A necessary condition for (11) to hold is that the litigation margins are binding with independent patent holders, that is, f B (f A ). Furthermore, we can explicitly solve this condition and show that it is satis…ed if and only if…”

Section: The Interplay Of the Demand Margin And Litigation Incentivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patent Pools, Litigation and Innovation

Choi

Gerlach

2013

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…First, there is no common consensus regarding the impact of patent pools on enterprise IP. Some studies report that patent pools decline research and development (R&D) competition and stall innovation (Lampe and Moser, 2016; Joshi and Nerkar, 2011), whereas others suggest that IP is supported by the patent pools (Vakili, 2016; Kwon, 2008; Denicolo, 2000). Meanwhile, certain studies claim that the proposed relationship is nonlinear and represents an inverted U-shaped pattern (Zhang et al , 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do repeated alliances within patent pools encourage enterprise innovation? Evidence from MPEG LA

Lai

Zhang

2023

CMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate whether repeated alliances between two members of a patent pool boost enterprise innovation. Furthermore, this paper intends to determine whether the innovation performance becomes higher or lower based on the partnership characteristics. Design/methodology/approach In this empirical study, hierarchical regression is used to analyze the longitudinal data obtained from 12 patent pools managed by MPEG LA during a time period ranging from 2006 to 2018. The members of patent pools comprise research institutions, firms and universities. Research analyses are performed based on a sample of 68,400 member pairs who had established repeated alliances. The information regarding such pairs is gathered from public databases. Findings Repeated alliances positively correlate with enterprise innovation performance in patent pools; this performance is higher when the two enterprises have exploratory collaborations. Conversely, the performance is lower when the partners have a similar technology base and are engaged in a technological competition (competitive learning and patent litigation). Moreover, the performance is lower when one partner demonstrates higher network centrality and richer structural holes than the other partner. Originality/value Patent pools play an instrumental role in eliminating patent-licensing barriers, thereby allowing mutual acquisition of complementary technologies, and cooperatively strengthening technology development. From the perspective of theories of coopetition, knowledge management and social network, this study explores the impact of patent pools on enterprise innovation performance and ascertains the moderating roles of technology coopetition, technology similarity and network position, thereby expanding the scope of innovation effect in the context of patent pools.

show abstract

Effects Of Patent Pools On Innovation Investment Ex Ante Perspectives

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Cited by 3 publications

References 10 publications

Patent pools, litigation, and innovation

Patent pools, litigation, and innovation

Patent Pools, Litigation and Innovation

Do repeated alliances within patent pools encourage enterprise innovation? Evidence from MPEG LA

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About