1996
DOI: 10.1029/96gl00384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of near‐surface waveguides on shallow high‐resolution seismic refraction and reflection data

Abstract: Waveguides formed between the earth's free‐surface and sharp subsurface velocity discontinuities, such as the watertable, may have a significant impact on high‐resolution seismic refraction and reflection data. Energy trapped in such waveguides may propagate over long distances with little loss due to geometrical spreading. The dispersive nature of the guided waves results in pronounced shingling of the first arrivals. This narrows the “optimum reflection window” between the first arrivals and the ground roll,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the depth to the water table, heterogeneity of the vadose zone, and the velocity contrast across the water table, additional sources of high-amplitude, low-velocity coherent noise can be generated which interfere with deeper, primary reflections. This includes guided waves trapped between the surface and the saturated zone (Robertsson et al, 1996), interbed multiples where significant impedance contrasts exist within the vadose zone, and converted modes generated at the water table (Figures 2 and 3). Each of these noise signals travels at velocities lower than the highest P-wave velocity above the saturated zone, so that for v sat /v dr y 1, interference with FIG.…”
Section: Coherent Noisementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Depending on the depth to the water table, heterogeneity of the vadose zone, and the velocity contrast across the water table, additional sources of high-amplitude, low-velocity coherent noise can be generated which interfere with deeper, primary reflections. This includes guided waves trapped between the surface and the saturated zone (Robertsson et al, 1996), interbed multiples where significant impedance contrasts exist within the vadose zone, and converted modes generated at the water table (Figures 2 and 3). Each of these noise signals travels at velocities lower than the highest P-wave velocity above the saturated zone, so that for v sat /v dr y 1, interference with FIG.…”
Section: Coherent Noisementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In many source gathers, strong low-frequency guided phases are also present, representing trapped energy within the near-surface low-velocity layer [e.g., Robertsson et al, 1996]. Strong reflections are visible only within the optimum reflection windows.…”
Section: Prestack Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few full-scale 3D seismic-reflection investigations conducted in crystalline environments have been published to date; these studies were acquired almost exclusively in conjunction with the mining industry for purposes of detecting and delineating ore deposits ͑e.g., Milkereit et al, 2000;Adam et al, 2003͒. Crystalline environments generally are characterized by a highly variable, low-velocity soil layer overlying a rather homogeneous, high-velocity rock mass exhibiting small vertical and lateral velocity changes. The low-velocity layer introduces significant static shifts, and the prominent bedrock interface is responsible for various mode conversions that contaminate shot gathers as high-amplitude, source-generated noise ͑Robertsson et al, 1996a; Robertsson et al, 1996b;Holliger and Robertsson, 1998͒. The source-generated noise can be misinterpreted as shallow reflections; thus, during processing it is essential to conduct a careful separation of shallow reflections from direct and refracted P-and SV-waves, guided phases, and surManuscript received by the Editor 15 May 2007; published online 31 October 2007. face waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%