1993
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0721459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Lighting and Dietary Energy Source on Male Market Turkeys.

Abstract: Two experiments were conducted with 528 and 500 Large White male turkeys to determine the effects of feeding either wheat or corn as the energy source and the effects of four different lighting treatments on growth, feed consumption, and feed conversion in a factorial arrangement. Wheat and corn diets were freely provided during the experiments and the lighting treatments began at 8 wk of age. The lighting treatments included: continuous light [C, 24 h light (L):0 h dark (D)], light decreasing 1 h/day per week… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feed intake of turkeys exposed to a lighting program of 12L:12D seemed to follow a compensatory pattern in which they increased their feed intake resulting in increased weight gain as compared to that of turkeys receiving a lighting program of 23L:1D and 18L:6D. Though this finding is consistent with the results of HERSTAD (1992), NEWBERRY (1992), HULET et al (1993), CLASSEN et al (1994, HEMILTON and KENNIE (1997), SENGUL et al (2000), andYAHAV et al (2000), it provides other implications. In this regard, in addition to the trial conditions, the aim of studies and the use of statistical models for the evaluation of the results of such studies can have significant influence on the outcome of such studies.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The feed intake of turkeys exposed to a lighting program of 12L:12D seemed to follow a compensatory pattern in which they increased their feed intake resulting in increased weight gain as compared to that of turkeys receiving a lighting program of 23L:1D and 18L:6D. Though this finding is consistent with the results of HERSTAD (1992), NEWBERRY (1992), HULET et al (1993), CLASSEN et al (1994, HEMILTON and KENNIE (1997), SENGUL et al (2000), andYAHAV et al (2000), it provides other implications. In this regard, in addition to the trial conditions, the aim of studies and the use of statistical models for the evaluation of the results of such studies can have significant influence on the outcome of such studies.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 79%