ABSTRACT. The growth of hernng Clupea harengus larvae w~thin a patch tracked for approximately 20 din the Orkney-Shetland area (north of Scotland) was ~nvest~gated using otollth microstructure and, in a supporting role, condition factor analyses. Daily otolith growth responded conservatively to external factors, there being significant autocorrelation within individual otolith increment sequences. Past growth history explained most of the variation of the data. Both otolith microstructure and condition factor analyses yielded consistent results, indicating that short term variations in growth rate were related to environmental factors such as wind-induced turbulence level, and changes in illumination and prey concentration A dome-shaped effect of wind-generated turbulence on larval growth was detected, which indicated a maximum response at a wind speed of approximately 14.5 m S-', a value very close to the speeds predicted by theoretical studies to generate maximum ingestion rates of larval fish.KEY \VORDS: Fish larvae. Growth Environment. Turbulence Otolith
INTRODUCTIONThe survival of fish larvae under natural circumstances is largely dependent on stage-specific mortality rate, i.e. the interaction between growth and mortality (Houde 1994). These 2 processes are interrelated since survival over any development interval is the product of mortality rate (d-l) and stage duration (d). Mortality rate generally decreases with increasing body size due to a variety of size-related effects on predator-prey interactions (Fuiman 1994), and hence the cumulative mortality for a population of fast growing individuals is less than that for slow growing individuals subject to the same predation rate (Houde & Schekter 1980, Houde 1987.Early attempts to detect growth varlability in fish larvae and relate it to environmental features were, with a few exceptions, unsuccessful (Heath 1992). Investigators examined the mean growth of the population, usually averaged over time periods of days or weeks, in relation to large-scale spatial (10 to 100 km) differences in prey abundance or environmental characteristics. However, this large-scale variation in time a n d space may account for only a small part of the total variability in growth. Small-scale spatlal and temporal variability, which could be more important for larval survival, is not examined in this approach. For example, small-scale turbulence may vary on time scales of minutes to hours and over short distances, particularly in the vertical plane. It is now evident that small-scale turbulence may have a profound influence on the encounter rate and capture success of planktonic predators (MacKenzie e t al. 1994). Thus there is scope for considerable within-population variability in growth induced by ingestion rate variability, over and above additional sources of variation between individuals due to foraging experience, genetic differences, etc. Studies of the effect of individual variability in growth on larval survival have shown that this factor may be as, or more, important...