2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Jigsaw II on Academic Achievement in English Prep Classes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
16
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, having acute interaction opportunities helped them learn mathematics skills effectively. These findings are also in line with the previous findings of the studies (Aydin, & Biyikli, 2017;Baroody, Clements & Sarama, 2019;Evcim & İpek, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, having acute interaction opportunities helped them learn mathematics skills effectively. These findings are also in line with the previous findings of the studies (Aydin, & Biyikli, 2017;Baroody, Clements & Sarama, 2019;Evcim & İpek, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Thinking styles in the viewpoint of mental self-government referred to people selecting the most comfortable management pattern from several methods for the management of daily activities. Researchers further explored thinking styles and personality and found out certain degree of overlap of the two (Evcim &İpek, 2013). Basically, styles differ from people and are not good or bad; the point is to match styles with environments and thoroughly develop personal strengths.…”
Section: E-learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason underlying this result may be students teach the topics they specialize each other, the Jigsaw method direct them to cooperation, they explain their ideas in a relaxed atmosphere while application of Jigsaw method, so learning process are more productive. These results are consistent with the results of the previous studies asserting that cooperative learning model plays an effective role in transforming knowledge into terminal behaviors, improving students' motivations and skills, facilitating the comprehension of subjects that are difficult to understand, and making the knowledge permanent by keeping students active, ensuring personal participation of students in the activities, and making students understand subjects better (Ghaith and El-Malak, 2004;Aladejana and Aderibigbe, 2007;Artut and Tarim, 2007;Doymuş, 2007;McKee et al ,2007, Maceiras et al, 2009Aksoy and Doymuş, 2011;Sancı and Kılıç, 2011;Zacharia et al, 2011;Akçay et al, 2012;Demir, 2012;Akkuş, 2013;Aksoy, 2013;Aksoy and Gürbüz, 2013;Evcim and İpek, 2013;Fırat, 2014;Çalıklar, 2015;Kardaş and Cemal, 2015;Şahin, 2011;Kardaş, 2013 b;Kardaş, 2015 a;Kardaş, 2014;Kardaş, 2013a;Kardaş, 2013c;Şahin et al, 2011;Kardaş, 2013 d;Maden et al, 2011). The effectiveness of the Jigsaw technique is supported by other studies as well (Özdilek et al, 2010;Koç, 2013;Kılınç and GüvenYıldırım, 2015;Aydın and Kömürkaraoğlu, 2016;Şahin, 2011 a;Maden, 2011a;Şahin, 2010 a;Maden, 2010;Avşar and A...…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%