2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of gallic acid on hemodynamic parameters and infarct size after ischemia-reperfusion in isolated rat hearts with alloxan-induced diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Ramezani-Aliakbari et al . reported that gallic acid improved left ventricular dysfunction in a rat model of alloxan-induced diabetes mellitus 25 . Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are implicated in cardiovascular diseases in diabetics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similarly, Ramezani-Aliakbari et al . reported that gallic acid improved left ventricular dysfunction in a rat model of alloxan-induced diabetes mellitus 25 . Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are implicated in cardiovascular diseases in diabetics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our study showed that the main component of BC is gallic acid, which could account for the antiarrhythmic and antinecroptotic effects. Gallic acid was reported to protect I/R‐caused infarct size and arrhythmias in diabetes rats . However, the detail underlying mechanisms were still unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ZXC is a complex system, benefits for ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) of its major active ingredients have been reported. As a bioactive compound, gallic acid prevented rats from hepatic ischemia and reperfusion injury (Bayramoglu et al, 2015; Ramezani-Aliakbari et al, 2017). Glycyrrhetinic acid could decrease histopathologyical damage and apoptosis in brain tissue injured by I/R damage in C57BL/J6 mouse (Oztanir et al, 2014) and play neuroprotective effects in PC12 cells (Tzu-Chien et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%