2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on physiology and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): A meta-analytic test of current hypotheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

32
105
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
32
105
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These rates are greater than the average of 32% of greenhouse and open-top chamber (OTC) studies (Curtis and Wang, 1998), 20% of a meta-analysis of FACE experiments for C3 plants , and 28% of a most recent review on wheat (Wang et al, 2013). My current results are close to the theoretical projection based on Rubisco's properties .…”
Section: The Positive Co 2 Fertilization Effectsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These rates are greater than the average of 32% of greenhouse and open-top chamber (OTC) studies (Curtis and Wang, 1998), 20% of a meta-analysis of FACE experiments for C3 plants , and 28% of a most recent review on wheat (Wang et al, 2013). My current results are close to the theoretical projection based on Rubisco's properties .…”
Section: The Positive Co 2 Fertilization Effectsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The CO 2 -induced reduction in stomatal conductance results in the decrease in transpiration and thus increases leaf temperature and reduces nutrient availability. Many studies have found that elevated CO 2 concentration has increased plant C/N ratio and decreased the protein concentration in wheat grains (Ma et al, 2007;Sinha et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2013). The CO 2 fertilization effect on plant growth may confound with other factors, such as temperature, water availability, ozone concentration, and nitrogen deposition, which may reduce or even cancel out the CO 2 fertilization effect (Fiscus et al, 2002;Yu et al, 2012;Mishra et al, 2013;Aljazairi and Nogues, 2015).…”
Section: The Negative Co 2 Fertilization Effectmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1d, also [22,64] and increased expression of TaNR1 is consistent with these changes). Significant decreases in shoot (leaf) N concentration under elevated [CO 2 ] have been reported in many studies [69].…”
Section: Pre-senescence Expression Patternsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A similar study by Kersebaum and Nendel (2014), also for winter wheat and varying sites in Germany, using the same climate model and scenario as the presented study, reported yield decreases by -11.6% if the effect was neglected and depending on the algorithm (three tested in total), 0.9 to 6.0% yield increases if the [CO 2 ] effect was included. Apart from this, several articles exist that deal with [CO 2 ] and crop yields on different scales and approaches (Ziska and Bunce, 2007;Högy and Fangmeier, 2008;Soussana et al, 2010;Vanuytrecht et al, 2011;Weigel and Manderscheid, 2012;Tausz et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%