2019
DOI: 10.1109/tsm.2019.2940320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Electrochemical Etching on InP HEMT Fabrication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, an electrode reaction between a substrate and deionized water has been reported [8], as well as the occurrence of electrochemically induced etching nonuniformities, depending on the conductivity of the substrate [9,10]. There are also reports that etching behavior differs depending on the surface material of the ohmic electrode and the size of the monitor opening [5,11]. In the manufacture of compound semiconductor devices, Au is generally used as the uppermost metal electrode layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an electrode reaction between a substrate and deionized water has been reported [8], as well as the occurrence of electrochemically induced etching nonuniformities, depending on the conductivity of the substrate [9,10]. There are also reports that etching behavior differs depending on the surface material of the ohmic electrode and the size of the monitor opening [5,11]. In the manufacture of compound semiconductor devices, Au is generally used as the uppermost metal electrode layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the gate metal liftoff, Pt is diffused controllably thorough the InP etch stop and part of the AlInAs barrier with nanometer precision. [ 11 ] To determine the impact of the diffusion depth of our sunk gates, an additional sample was processed in parallel using a lower Pt thickness (3 instead of 4 nm) during the gate metal evaporation with the same offset gate configuration as detailed previously. As shown in Figure a, the device with thinner Pt exhibits reduced leakage current due to the increased gate‐to‐channel distance (72% lower leakage at V GS = 0.3 V and V DS = 0.75 V).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the T‐gate electrode was formed by evaporation of a Pt/Ti/Pt/Au metal stack in the center of the gate recess region to center gate foot in the recess (symmetric recess but offset gate position) after a two‐step EBL process. The gates were sunk through the InP etch stop and into the AlInAs barrier as per the study given by Saranovac et al [ 11 ] and passivated with a 15 nm Al 2 O 3 layer by atomic layer deposition (ALD). Careful investigation with focused ion beam (FIB) on both structures confirmed a 50 nm gate footprint, as shown in Figure .…”
Section: Process Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the sample was rinsed in a fresh DMSO to eliminate any residual metal particles. To protect the delicate 2D layer from the impact of strong solvents, unlike e.g., compound semiconductors [35], For contact lithography, an image reversal process was employed. To execute this, an initial spin-coating of the LOR was performed at 5000 rpm for 30 s, followed by baking at 150 • C for 5 min.…”
Section: Photolithography Of 2d-tmdc Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the sample was rinsed in a fresh DMSO to eliminate any residual metal particles. To protect the delicate 2D layer from the impact of strong solvents, unlike e.g., compound semiconductors [35], it is essential to avoid prolonged exposure or subjecting the sample to high-temperature DMSO treatment. The failed process due to using high temperature DMSO is shown later in this section.…”
Section: Photolithography Of 2d-tmdc Layermentioning
confidence: 99%