1974
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1974.0580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dental health instruction on university students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
2

Year Published

1981
1981
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Following a single instruction in oral hygiene a relapse towards baseline plaque scores has been observed (Legler et al 1971, Elliott et ai. 1972, Gjermo !972, Beliini et al 1974, Dennison et al 1974, Nyman et al 1975. This is in disagreement with the results of the present study where no relapse was observed 7 months after a single instruction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Following a single instruction in oral hygiene a relapse towards baseline plaque scores has been observed (Legler et al 1971, Elliott et ai. 1972, Gjermo !972, Beliini et al 1974, Dennison et al 1974, Nyman et al 1975. This is in disagreement with the results of the present study where no relapse was observed 7 months after a single instruction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…too short a program, or the participants being too stressed by other factors (4). By contrast, in the present study the clinical improvement was maintained 3 '/j yr after the termination of the dental health education program.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Different explanations have been given for not achieving a long-term effect, e.g. too short a program, or the participants being too stressed by other factors (4). Some authors (21,22) explain the failure of longterm effect by the lack of reinforcement and repetition in dental health education programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is tion and control groups (Se, Co) after 6 weeks, consistent with the results of a previous study while only a slight decrease had occurred in the showing improved oral cleanliness in patients Table 7. The distribution of patients in the various groups according to their plaque scores recorded at 7 and 13 months (P: patients with a 7-month plaque score less than 20%; Q: patients with a 7-month plaque score higher than 20% but reduced to less than 20% following the tooth brushing test; R: patients with a 7-month plaque score higher than 20% after the tooth brushing test) given a self-educational tnanual in oral hygiene technique (Glavind et al 1981) and with other studies demonstrating short-tertn irnprovements following oral hygiene instruction (Eegler et al 1971, Elliott et al 1972, Gjermo 1972, Bellini et al 1974, Dennison et al, 1974, Morrison et al 1980. The lack of improvement at 6 weeks in the patients of the delayed instruction group (De) who had their teeth scaled at the initial visit without receiving instruction in oral hygiene indicates that scaling of the teeth alone does not reduce the presence of plaque and gingival inflammation for a longer period of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%