2017
DOI: 10.1177/1098300717723353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of CW-FIT on Teachers’ Ratings of Elementary School Students at Risk for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

Abstract: Social Skill Deficits, Problem Behaviors, and Academic Difficulties Students classified with EBD consistently demonstrate lower social skills than typical peers or their peers with other disabilities (Lane, Carter, Pierson, & Glaeser, 2006; Wagner et al., 2005). Social skills are learned, situationspecific behaviors that result in positive interpersonal interactions (Merrell & Gimpel, 1998; Young, Caldarella, Richardson, & Young, 2012). Shores and Wehby (1999) noted that the social interactions between teacher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, although progress toward meeting goals was discussed with students in all seven studies, it was not clear that data were used or graphed to monitor student progress in any of these studies. In addition to the outcomes reported above, social problem solving with a goal-setting component resulted in significant improvements in teacher ratings of student behavior and social competence (Caldarella et al, 2009;Lochman et al, 1989), significant decreases in suicide risk and related risk factors (Randell et al, 2001), and significant decreases in off-task behavior (Lochman, 1984;Lochman et al, 1985Lochman et al, , 1989. Like the majority of studies included in this review, none of these studies examined the unique effects of individual intervention components on student outcomes.…”
Section: Social Problem Solvingmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, although progress toward meeting goals was discussed with students in all seven studies, it was not clear that data were used or graphed to monitor student progress in any of these studies. In addition to the outcomes reported above, social problem solving with a goal-setting component resulted in significant improvements in teacher ratings of student behavior and social competence (Caldarella et al, 2009;Lochman et al, 1989), significant decreases in suicide risk and related risk factors (Randell et al, 2001), and significant decreases in off-task behavior (Lochman, 1984;Lochman et al, 1985Lochman et al, , 1989. Like the majority of studies included in this review, none of these studies examined the unique effects of individual intervention components on student outcomes.…”
Section: Social Problem Solvingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In these seven studies, students participated in small-group interventions that were generally led by adults, such as school counselors, mentors, and teachers (Amish, Gesten, Smith, Clark, & Stark, 1988;Caldarella et al, 2009;Lochman, Burch, Curry, & Lampron, 1984;Lochman, Coie, Underwood, & Terry, 1993;Lochman, Lampron, Burch, & Curry, 1985;Lochman, Lampron, Gemmer, Harris, & Wyckoff, 1989;Randell et al, 2001). All interventions in this group of studies targeted multiple self-determination and social skills but mostly focused on students solving social problems and setting goals to improve their behavior.…”
Section: Social Problem Solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have assessed the impact of an interdependent group contingency strategy, CW-FIT, on student and teacher behaviors (Kamps et al, 2015; Wills et al, 2016; Wills et al, 2018b). CW-FIT is a multitiered intervention encompassing many evidence-based classroom management strategies (e.g., identification and teaching of expectations, precorrection, active supervision of behaviors, immediate and consistent feedback, 4:1 praise-to-reprimand ratio, minimizing reward of problem behaviors, and an interdependent group contingency; Caldarella et al, 2018). Implementation of CW-FIT Tier 1 begins with explicit instruction of target social behaviors (e.g., following directions the first time, gaining teacher attention).…”
Section: Classroom-level Positive Behavior Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CW-FIT has demonstrated a positive impact on elementary student and teacher behavior (Caldarella et al, 2018; Kamps et al, 2011; Wills et al, 2018a). Kamps and colleagues (2011) assessed the intervention with 107 students in culturally diverse elementary classrooms and found increases in on-task behavior, decreases in off-task behavior, and increased teacher praise.…”
Section: Classroom-level Positive Behavior Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conforme informado no site oficial, escolas que adotam o SWPBIS são capazes de iniciar a implementação de Nível I a um custo total unitário de US$ 5.000 a US$ 10.000 por escola em um período de dois anos. Seletiva, e se propõe a ajudar os professores na implementação consistente e habilidosa de estratégias baseadas em evidências para gestão da sala de aula (Caldarella et al, 2018). O CW-FIT está ancorado nas estratégias relacionadas ao que a literatura chama de Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports (PBIS) (Crone et al, 2015).…”
Section: Crimesolutionsunclassified