2003
DOI: 10.1080/0014013031000066500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of chronic low back pain, age and gender on vertical spinal creep

Abstract: This study investigated the effect of chronic low back pain, age, gender, and time of measurement on the magnitude of vertical spinal creep (VSC) and its recovery. A mixed design, involving three independent variables (chronic low back pain, age, and gender) and one repeated variable (time), was used. One hundred and six subjects of both genders, with and without chronic low back pain, aged between 20 and 60 years, participated in the study. The measurement of VSC and its recovery was performed using a seated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
31
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with previous findings, which indicated no effect on spine height changes associated with sex, 9 suggesting that trunk height changes associated with various recovery positions can be generalized for both sexes in asymptomatic young adults. Spine height measurements, using stadiometer protocols, are largely dependent on lumbar intervertebral disk hydration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are in agreement with previous findings, which indicated no effect on spine height changes associated with sex, 9 suggesting that trunk height changes associated with various recovery positions can be generalized for both sexes in asymptomatic young adults. Spine height measurements, using stadiometer protocols, are largely dependent on lumbar intervertebral disk hydration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…The research methods of the current study matched the methodology and population of Kourtis et al who reported mean changes (−5.03 mm) in spinal height similar to the changes recorded in our study (−3.24 mm). 6 These findings are consistent with previous investigations including 4.28 mm height loss, 9 3.07 and 3.55 mm height loss, 10 and 3.85 mm height loss 11 recorded after 5 minutes of sitting in young adults. The consistency of the current results with previously reported laboratory-based stadiometer research suggests that the measurement protocol and stadiometer apparatus constructed for this study achieved an appropriate level of measurement accuracy to be applied to future research in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…The disc dehydration resulted in loss of SH and decrease of lumbar spinal flexibility. However, some previous studies indicated that the relationship between age and SH loss or recovery was still unclear (Kanlayanaphotporn et al 2003;Michel and Helander 1994;Reilly and Freeman 2006). Therefore, there is a need to further investigate the influence of the proposed recovery postures on SH recovery and maintaining LROM in other age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1) which tends to be bulky, non‐portable and unsuited for field measurement. In general, the device measures linear change in stature or changes in spinal segments (Stothart and McGill, 2000; C. L. N. Rodacki et al, 2001; Kanlayanaphotporn et al, 2003; Kourtis et al, 2004; Mannion et al, 2004; A. L. F. Rodacki et al, 2007; Berryman et al, 2008). A. L. F. Rodacki et al (2007) developed a stadiometer which provides five probes to determine the spine outline at C4 (cervical lordosis curve), T7 (thoracic kyphosis) and L3 (lumbar lordosis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) which tends to be bulky, non-portable and unsuited for field measurement. In general, the device measures linear change in stature or changes in spinal segments (Stothart and McGill, 2000;C. L. N. Rodacki et al, 2001;Kanlayanaphotporn et al, 2003;Kourtis et al, Fig. 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%