2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of chronic gamma irradiation: a multigenerational study using Caenorhabditis elegans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After chronic irradiation, a recent study of our team has shown that reproduction is the more sensitive macroscopic parameter regarding survival and growth [17]. Moreover, our first study has also highlighted that, contrary to acute irradiation, chronic irradiation from 3.3 Gy induced a decrease of the number of progeny without impacting the hatching success [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After chronic irradiation, a recent study of our team has shown that reproduction is the more sensitive macroscopic parameter regarding survival and growth [17]. Moreover, our first study has also highlighted that, contrary to acute irradiation, chronic irradiation from 3.3 Gy induced a decrease of the number of progeny without impacting the hatching success [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The free living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is a particularly convenient model organism to address this environmental risk assessment based proteomic issue [14,15]. With its fully sequenced genome and its short life cycle, C. elegans has been successfully used to study acute and chronic irradiation effects and their consequences on germline development and hatching [4,[16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have tended to indicate a persistence of the effects to unexposed generations such as for gold nanoparticles [19] and metals in C. elegans [31], and to some extent for carbon nanotubes in D. magna [31]. In C. elegans, even increased negative effects on individuals after cessation of g-irradiation compared with continuously exposed ones were observed [32]. To our knowledge, none have so far looked at recovery from multigenerational exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ionizing radiation is known to induce oxidative stress, DNA damage, and apoptosis, which therefore constitute usual molecular markers for evaluating toxicity mechanisms (Knowles ; Simon et al ; Jaafar et al ; Gagnaire et al ; Praveen Kumar et al ; Sinha et al ). Significant effects in animals (fish, nematode, Daphnia ) in terms of survival, reproduction, and development have been observed (Knowles ; Simon et al ; Adam‐Guillermin et al ; Buisset‐Goussen et al ; Gagnaire et al ; Parisot et al ). Moreover, damage effects in fish have mainly been observed for early life stages, which are considered to be the most vulnerable to ionizing radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, the consequences of parental exposure for offspring generations have not yet been taken into account in the ERA. However, multigenerational studies have become of great interest (Buisset-Goussen et al 2014;Parisot et al 2015;Hurem et al 2017a;Lemos et al 2017). For fish, the progeny of adult zebrafish exposed to 53 mGy h -1 ( 60 Co gamma radiation) for 27 d showed a 100% mortality rate occurring at the gastrula stage (Hurem et al 2017a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%