2013
DOI: 10.19026/ijava.5.5603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Autologous Platelets Rich Plasma on Full-thickness Cutaneous Wounds Healing in Goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In experimental studies in horses on PRP treatment of cutaneous wounds of the extremities, which are resistant to healing and resemble chronic ulcers in humans, Carter and colleagues found that PRP improved the quality of healing by producing organized collagen bundles as in the present study, and by accelerating epithelial differentiation, whereas Monteiro and colleagues reported that PRP slowed wound healing significantly (less exuberant granulation tissue) but no significant differences in histological variables were revealed between PRP-treated and untreated wounds (21,22). On the other hand, the use of autologous PRP for the closure of 3x3 cm full-thickness cutaneous wounds in goats accelerated the healing process in comparison to control wounds (41). In a similar experimental study in rabbits in acute wounds treated with PRP, a trend towards increased angiogenic response and epithelialization was reported, whereas in our study no significant differences in these variables were found between PRPtreated and control wounds (15).…”
Section: Controlsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…In experimental studies in horses on PRP treatment of cutaneous wounds of the extremities, which are resistant to healing and resemble chronic ulcers in humans, Carter and colleagues found that PRP improved the quality of healing by producing organized collagen bundles as in the present study, and by accelerating epithelial differentiation, whereas Monteiro and colleagues reported that PRP slowed wound healing significantly (less exuberant granulation tissue) but no significant differences in histological variables were revealed between PRP-treated and untreated wounds (21,22). On the other hand, the use of autologous PRP for the closure of 3x3 cm full-thickness cutaneous wounds in goats accelerated the healing process in comparison to control wounds (41). In a similar experimental study in rabbits in acute wounds treated with PRP, a trend towards increased angiogenic response and epithelialization was reported, whereas in our study no significant differences in these variables were found between PRPtreated and control wounds (15).…”
Section: Controlsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Use of PRP in animals is steadily increasing, and its effects on tissue healing have been reported in many studies, particularly in bone regeneration and ligament or tendon reconstruction. Some studies have also described its healing effects in cutaneous wounds in dogs [ 2 18 27 ], goats [ 1 ], horses [ 7 23 ], and other species [ 10 19 ]. In both humans and animals, PRP is commonly processed for application to cutaneous wounds by mixing with calcium chloride and thrombin to form a platelet gel, which can be applied like an ointment [ 5 16 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gel formulation is easy to use but has certain disadvantages, particularly in animals, such as uneven distribution at movable body parts, possible loss, limited accessibility to the wound surface, and limited duration of effect. Therefore, injection of PRP has been used in orthopedic procedures, cosmetic surgery, and cutaneous wounds [ 1 3 10 26 ]. The present study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of intralesional injection of PRP in cutaneous wounds in dogs by evaluating tissue healing parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the forest plot in Fig 3 showed two studies with not significant negative ES [ 51 , 53 ], two studies with null ES [ 30 , 46 ], seven studies with not significant positive ES [ 42 , 44 , 45 , 50 , 52 , 56 , 58 ] and four studies with significant positive ES [ 43 , 54 , 55 , 57 ]: the exclusion of each of the studies, in the sensitivity analysis, would have no relevant effect on the overall results of the meta-analysis supporting the efficacy of PRP for primary outcome. ( Fig 4 )…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is associated with a moderate degree of heterogeneity. The quality of evidence obtained in the meta-analysis for the primary outcome was demonstrated by sensitivity analysis, excluding alternately each of the studies, even showing negative ES [ 51 , 53 ], null ES [ 30 , 46 ], or statistically positive ES [ 43 , 54 , 55 , 57 ]: no relevant changes occurred in the results of the meta-analysis of primary outcome, persisting in statistical agreement with the hypothesis that supports the superiority of the PRP group. The sensitivity analysis finds its own indication in the identification of potential "outlier studies".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%