“…Additionally, for the developing and emerging economies, higher commercial bank lending is also strongly positively correlated with carbon emissions by other combustion industries. These findings are in agreement with the previous findings through Tables [4][5][6][7][8]. Although the emerging and developed economies continually put great efforts towards curbing carbon emissions by the combustion industries [61], our results show that this reduction is not particularly evident when considering the effect of DCPS and CBL on combustion industry emissions.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionsupporting
In recent years, the developed, emerging, and developing economies have prioritized environmental sustainability attainment. In an attempt to offer some potential policy choices towards the achievement of sustainable development, this paper shifts emphasis from the popularly discussed economic development and carbon emissions nexus. Instead, we examine the impact of the banking and financial system’s activities on carbon emissions for a sample of 45 countries. These are comprised of developed, emerging, and developing countries between 1990 and 2017. To fill the gap in the literature, the nexus is examined in seven different phases. This study exposes robust and reliable empirical results with the use of Feasible General Least Squares, random effects with regards to the Durbin–Wu–Hausman test, and Difference General Method of Moments panel data estimation models. Our findings indicate that the increase of domestic credit to the private sector and commercial bank lending consistently contributes towards aggravated carbon emissions in all economic types. Additionally, increased deposit rates in developing economies, increased lending rates in developed economies, and increased deposit rates in emerging economies contribute towards the overall reduction of carbon emissions. The decrease in lending to high GHG emitting members of the private sector by financial institutions in all economies is recommended based on the results of this study.
“…Additionally, for the developing and emerging economies, higher commercial bank lending is also strongly positively correlated with carbon emissions by other combustion industries. These findings are in agreement with the previous findings through Tables [4][5][6][7][8]. Although the emerging and developed economies continually put great efforts towards curbing carbon emissions by the combustion industries [61], our results show that this reduction is not particularly evident when considering the effect of DCPS and CBL on combustion industry emissions.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionsupporting
In recent years, the developed, emerging, and developing economies have prioritized environmental sustainability attainment. In an attempt to offer some potential policy choices towards the achievement of sustainable development, this paper shifts emphasis from the popularly discussed economic development and carbon emissions nexus. Instead, we examine the impact of the banking and financial system’s activities on carbon emissions for a sample of 45 countries. These are comprised of developed, emerging, and developing countries between 1990 and 2017. To fill the gap in the literature, the nexus is examined in seven different phases. This study exposes robust and reliable empirical results with the use of Feasible General Least Squares, random effects with regards to the Durbin–Wu–Hausman test, and Difference General Method of Moments panel data estimation models. Our findings indicate that the increase of domestic credit to the private sector and commercial bank lending consistently contributes towards aggravated carbon emissions in all economic types. Additionally, increased deposit rates in developing economies, increased lending rates in developed economies, and increased deposit rates in emerging economies contribute towards the overall reduction of carbon emissions. The decrease in lending to high GHG emitting members of the private sector by financial institutions in all economies is recommended based on the results of this study.
“…The result indicates that, Ghana's economy has not grown enough to promote the use of renewable energy. There are other studies that state that economic development causes carbon emissions (Malik et al, 2020;Ridzuan, Marwan, Khalid, Ali, & Tseng, 2020). However, it is not so for Ghana.…”
The fight against global warming has been a global battle. Environmental sustainability and a sustainable economy have been a concern for many nations, government organizations, and non-government organizations. Therefore, it is highly recommended to investigate the factors that lead to carbon emissions and how the world could overcome them. This study uses GMM and FMOLS to analyze the contribution of globalization which is measured as foreign direct investment and trade openness, economic development, and population growth towards the use of renewable energy. The period under study is from 1990 to 2015. The result of the study indicates trade openness helps promote the use of renewable energy. A 1% increase in trade openness would raise renewable energy consumption by 39%. However, foreign direct investment does not motivate the use of renewable energy, and economic development does not add to renewable energy consumption. Population growth helps promote renewable energy usage. The government of Ghana has to restrict its environmental regulations to protect the environment from foreign investors.
I.
“…At present, some scholars at home and abroad have studied the relationship between agricultural carbon dioxide emissions and social economic growth. Ridzuan et al [ 2 ] found that the relationship between carbon dioxide emissions and economic development is an inverted U, while Alkhathlan and Javid [ 3 ] believed that the relationship between them was a N-shaped curve. Coondoo and Dinda [ 4 ] analyzed the relationship between agricultural carbon dioxide emissions and per capita income from the perspective of Granger causality, and found that different countries had different causality.…”
With the change of social economic system and the rapid growth of agricultural economy in China, the amount of agricultural energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions has increased dramatically. Based on the estimation of agricultural carbon dioxide emissions from 1991 to 2018 in China, this paper uses EKC model to analyze economic growth and agricultural carbon dioxide emissions. The Kaya method is used to decompose the factors affecting agricultural carbon dioxide emissions. The experimental results show that there is a co-integration relationship between economic growth and the total intensity of agricultural carbon emissions, and between economic growth and the intensity of carbon emissions caused by five types of carbon sources: fertilizer, pesticide, agricultural film, agricultural diesel oil and tillage. Economic growth is the main driving factor of agricultural carbon dioxide emissions. In addition, technological progress has a strong role in promoting carbon emission reduction, but it has a certain randomness. However, the impact of energy consumption structure and population size on carbon emissions is not obvious.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.