2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of affective pictures on pain sensitivity and cortical responses induced by laser stimuli in healthy subjects and migraine patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(77 reference statements)
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data show augmentation of pain during viewing negative emotional pictures which has been also reported in previous studies (de Wied and Verbaten, 2001; Kenntner-Mabiala and Pauli, 2005; Godinho et al, 2006; Kenntner-Mabiala et al, 2008; de Tommaso et al, 2009; Roy et al, 2009; Ploner et al, 2011). In the peri-stimulus interval, none of the components showed stronger amplitudes during negative than positive or neutral emotional pictures, and in each independent component the positive emotional pictures showed the strongest activation in at least one time interval.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our data show augmentation of pain during viewing negative emotional pictures which has been also reported in previous studies (de Wied and Verbaten, 2001; Kenntner-Mabiala and Pauli, 2005; Godinho et al, 2006; Kenntner-Mabiala et al, 2008; de Tommaso et al, 2009; Roy et al, 2009; Ploner et al, 2011). In the peri-stimulus interval, none of the components showed stronger amplitudes during negative than positive or neutral emotional pictures, and in each independent component the positive emotional pictures showed the strongest activation in at least one time interval.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, one could speculate that the inefficacy of a sham rTMS at the trigeminal zone in controls may be caused by the somatotopy of placebo effect, such as that suggested by Benedetti et al [34]. The modulation of nociceptive processing has peculiar aspects in migraine patients, as it is less evident under distraction in cognitive tasks and is normally induced under distraction by affective images [27, 35]. The sham TMS procedure induced a placebo effect on nociceptive processing in migraine patients, without an evident effect on subjective pain rating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The N1 component, which refers to the earliest stage of perception processing [10, 34], was not involved by the changes occurring during the VR representation. Accordingly, N1 changes occurred neither during the contemporary vision of images with different affective content in migraine patients and controls, nor during the vision of beautiful pictures in healthy volunteers [12, 14]. The vertex complex was modulated in an increasing direction during the virtual hospital immersion in migraine, while a quite opposite trend was observed in healthy controls, in accord with the trend of pain rating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migraine is a disorder of neurovascular origin, which may become chronic and invalidating. Distraction induced by cognitive task was ineffective in modulating pain processing in chronic migraine [16], differently from the vision of affective images which was able to reduce LEPs amplitude in the same type of patients [14]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%